30,665 responses from 172 respondents to 200 items.
One of 21 tables from the same source; this one measures Health-ORSC-Bench over-refusal on health prompts. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | AI models as respondents: 172 large language models scored on 200 items of Health-ORSC-Bench, health-related prompts for measuring over-refusal and safe completion. resp is 1 if the model COMPLIED (no refusal phrase found) and 0 if it refused; a string-match heuristic, not a judge. From the OpenEval archive (Hugging Face Open-Eval-Commons/OpenEval, revision 23a1ded9), scores only, one run per model x item. id = model name, verbatim (aliases and case variants not merged). Respondents are not independent: many models share base weights, decoding temperature varies across models (cov_temperature), and items may appear in training data. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Jiang, H., Zhang, S., Zhu, D., Bai, Y., Truong, S. T., Yi, X., Koyejo, S., Xie, X., & Xiao, Z. (2026). AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases. arXiv:2604.03244 (v2). Benchmark: Health-ORSC-Bench, arXiv:2601.17642 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17642 |
| DOI | 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03244 |
| Licence | CC BY-NC 4.0 |
| Source data | https://huggingface.co/datasets/Open-Eval-Commons/OpenEval/tree/23a1ded985b3c2cdaaddb27581a35bfabe0ad7e7 |
| Responses | 30,665 |
|---|---|
| Respondents | 172 |
| Items | 200 |
| Response categories | 2 |
| Responses per respondent | 178.285 |
| Responses per item | 153.325 |
| Density | 0.891 |
| Longitudinal | FALSE |
| age range | Not applicable (non-person) |
|---|---|
| sample | AI/model |
| construct type | Behavioral |
| measurement tool | Test |
| item format | Constructed Response |
| primary language(s) | eng |
| construct name | Health-ORSC-Bench over-refusal on health prompts |
This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, jiang_2026_openeval.py. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.
| Column | What it is | Source column |
|---|---|---|
| IRW standard columns | ||
id | IRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task). | made in the build script |
item | IRW standard Item identifier. | made in the build script |
resp | IRW standard Response value. | made in the build script |
| Respondent covariates | ||
cov_model_size | Covariate | made in the build script |
cov_temperature | Covariate | made in the build script |
What item codes and covariate values stand for is in the codebook released with the source data.
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0 — non-commercial use only.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("jiang_2026_openeval_health_orsc_bench")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("jiang_2026_openeval_health_orsc_bench")
@misc{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2604.03244,
doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2604.03244},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03244},
author = {Jiang, Han and Zhang, Susu and Zhu, Dongyao and Bai, Yuzhuo and Truong, Sang T. and Yi, Xiaoyuan and Koyejo, Sanmi and Xie, Xing and Xiao, Ziang},
keywords = {Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computers and Society (cs.CY), Databases (cs.DB), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
title = {AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases},
publisher = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | item_response_warehouse_6 v5.11 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qahq-j855 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v5.11 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |