jiang_2026_openeval_culturalbench

343,991 responses from 62 respondents to 6,135 items.

One of 21 tables from the same source; this one measures CulturalBench cultural knowledge. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

DescriptionAI models as respondents: 62 large language models scored on 6,135 items of CulturalBench, questions on cultural knowledge across many countries. resp is 1 if the model's answer matched the reference (quasi prefix exact match). From the OpenEval archive (Hugging Face Open-Eval-Commons/OpenEval, revision 23a1ded9), scores only, one run per model x item. id = model name, verbatim (aliases and case variants not merged). Respondents are not independent: many models share base weights, decoding temperature varies across models (cov_temperature), and items may appear in training data.
ReferenceJiang, H., Zhang, S., Zhu, D., Bai, Y., Truong, S. T., Yi, X., Koyejo, S., Xie, X., & Xiao, Z. (2026). AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases. arXiv:2604.03244 (v2). Benchmark: Chiu, Y. Y., et al. (2025). CulturalBench: A Robust, Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Measuring LMs' Cultural Knowledge Through Human-AI Red-Teaming. ACL 2025. https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1247/
DOI10.48550/arXiv.2604.03244
LicenceCC BY-NC 4.0
Source datahttps://huggingface.co/datasets/Open-Eval-Commons/OpenEval/tree/23a1ded985b3c2cdaaddb27581a35bfabe0ad7e7

Size and shape

Responses343,991
Respondents62
Items6,135
Response categories2
Responses per respondent5548.242
Responses per item56.070
Density0.904
LongitudinalFALSE

Classification

age rangeNot applicable (non-person)
sampleAI/model
construct typeCognitive/educational
measurement toolTest
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng
construct nameCulturalBench cultural knowledge

Codebook

This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, jiang_2026_openeval.py. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.

ColumnWhat it isSource column
IRW standard columns
idIRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task).made in the build script
itemIRW standard Item identifier.made in the build script
respIRW standard Response value.made in the build script
Respondent covariates
cov_model_sizeCovariate made in the build script
cov_temperatureCovariate made in the build script

What item codes and covariate values stand for is in the codebook released with the source data.

Get the data

Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0 — non-commercial use only.

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("jiang_2026_openeval_culturalbench")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("jiang_2026_openeval_culturalbench")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2604.03244,
  doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2604.03244},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03244},
  author = {Jiang, Han and Zhang, Susu and Zhu, Dongyao and Bai, Yuzhuo and Truong, Sang T. and Yi, Xiaoyuan and Koyejo, Sanmi and Xie, Xing and Xiao, Ziang},
  keywords = {Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computers and Society (cs.CY), Databases (cs.DB), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
  title = {AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases},
  publisher = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse_6 v5.11
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qahq-j855
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv5.11
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0