14,544 rated or chosen profiles from 3,636 respondents, in up to 2 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
One of 5 tables from the same source; this one is the study2 table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | 3636 Japanese online (Lucid) respondents each saw 2 pairs of hypothetical House of Representatives candidates (occupation, Diet experience, education, age, gender, party, relatives in politics) and rated each candidate's desirability as a member of the House of Representatives (1-6); in one arm each candidate also had a randomly assigned 'special note' on populist or elitist conduct. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Miwa, H. (2024). Why voters prefer politicians with particular personal attributes: The role of voter demand for populists. Political Studies, 73(2), 725-752. |
| DOI | 10.1177/00323217241263295 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/71Y4GO |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 3,636 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 14,544 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 2 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | ja |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| rating | How do you feel about each of the Candidates [X] and [Y] when you use the measure of 'being quite undesirable as a member of the HoR' as one extreme and 'being very desirable as a member of the HoR' as the other? (translated) [rating, 1 (Being quite undesirable as a member of the HoR) to 6 (Being very desirable as a member of the HoR)] |
|---|
attr_ageattr_diet_experienceattr_educationattr_genderattr_noteattr_partyattr_previous_occupationattr_relatives_politiciansattrpos_ageattrpos_diet_experienceattrpos_educationattrpos_genderattrpos_partyattrpos_previous_occupationattrpos_relatives_politicianscov_agecov_ant1cov_ant2cov_ant3cov_blockcov_dq1cov_dq10cov_dq2cov_dq3cov_dq4cov_dq5cov_dq6cov_dq7cov_dq8cov_dq9cov_educationcov_gendercov_gender_lucidcov_lrcov_man1cov_man2cov_man3cov_pop1cov_pop2cov_pop3cov_prefectureidprofileratingtasktrial_arm
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("miwa_2024_populist_study2", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("miwa_2024_populist_study2", source="conj")
@article{Miwa_2024, title={Why Voters Prefer Politicians With Particular Personal Attributes: The Role of Voter Demand for Populists}, volume={73}, ISSN={1467-9248}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00323217241263295}, DOI={10.1177/00323217241263295}, number={2}, journal={Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Miwa, Hirofumi}, year={2024}, month=July, pages={725–752} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |