10,000 rated or chosen profiles from 1,000 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
One of 5 tables from the same source; this one is the study1 table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | 1000 Japanese online (Lucid) respondents each saw 5 pairs of hypothetical House of Representatives candidates (occupation, Diet experience, education, age, gender, party, relatives in politics) and rated each candidate's perceived anti-elitism and people-centrism (1-6); arms with and without party affiliation shown. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Miwa, H. (2024). Why voters prefer politicians with particular personal attributes: The role of voter demand for populists. Political Studies, 73(2), 725-752. |
| DOI | 10.1177/00323217241263295 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/71Y4GO |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,000 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 10,000 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | ja |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| rating_anti_elitism | How do you feel about each of the Candidates [X] and [Y] when you use the measure of 'desire to maintain the existing way of the society' as one extreme and 'being active in breaking vested interests' as the other? (translated) [rating, 1 (Desire to maintain the existing way of the society) to 6 (Being active in breaking vested interests)] |
|---|---|
| rating_people_centrism | How do you feel about each of the Candidates [X] and [Y] when you use the measure of 'placing importance on the opinions of politicians and experts' as one extreme and 'placing importance on the opinions of the general public' as the other? (translated) [rating, 1 (Placing importance on the opinions of politicians and experts) to 6 (Placing importance on the opinions of the general public)] |
attr_ageattr_diet_experienceattr_educationattr_genderattr_partyattr_previous_occupationattr_relatives_politiciansattrpos_ageattrpos_diet_experienceattrpos_educationattrpos_genderattrpos_partyattrpos_previous_occupationattrpos_relatives_politicianscov_agecov_ant1cov_ant2cov_ant3cov_dq1cov_dq10cov_dq2cov_dq3cov_dq4cov_dq5cov_dq6cov_dq7cov_dq8cov_dq9cov_educationcov_gendercov_gender_lucidcov_man1cov_man2cov_man3cov_pop1cov_pop2cov_pop3cov_prefectureidprofilerating_anti_elitismrating_people_centrismtasktrial_armtrial_question_order
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("miwa_2024_populist_study1", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("miwa_2024_populist_study1", source="conj")
@article{Miwa_2024, title={Why Voters Prefer Politicians With Particular Personal Attributes: The Role of Voter Demand for Populists}, volume={73}, ISSN={1467-9248}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00323217241263295}, DOI={10.1177/00323217241263295}, number={2}, journal={Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Miwa, Hirofumi}, year={2024}, month=July, pages={725–752} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |