7,215 rated or chosen profiles from 2,405 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 1 profile varying on 4 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the violence table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Albanian-speaking adults in Kosovo (face-to-face, n = 2,405) each heard 3 vignettes about a young man's political violence (going to fight in Syria, a riot against Serbs in Mitrovica, a violent protest in Prishtina) in which his job situation, attachment to the community and who encouraged him were randomized, and rated how expected his decision was (1 completely expected .. 5 completely unexpected). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Krakowski, K., & Kursani, S. (2023). Why do people use informal justice? Experimental evidence from Kosovo. Journal of Experimental Political Science. |
| DOI | 10.1017/XPS.2023.18 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KD3ZUN |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,405 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 7,215 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 3 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 4 |
| Topic | crime justice policing |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | scenario |
| Country | XK |
| Language shown | sq |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Each respondent heard all three events once (event is within-respondent, order randomized); the job clause wording is event-specific (Syria: no job for many years / good salary; riot: no suitable job for years / law office; protest: parking lot / bank), per the questionnaire. |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| rating | Now, taking into account these circumstances about {name}, what do you think of his decision to {go to Syria | participate in this violent riot against the Serbs | participate in this violent protest}? His decision was: (translated) [rating, 1 (Completely expected) to 5 (Completely unexpected)] |
|---|
attr_community_tieattr_encouragerattr_eventattr_jobattrpos_community_tieattrpos_encouragerattrpos_jobcov_agecov_educationcov_gendercov_household_sizecov_maritalcov_municipalitycov_settlementcov_survey_weightcov_trust_justicecov_years_in_neighborhoodidprofileratingtasktrial_vignette_text
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("krakowski_2023_violence", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("krakowski_2023_violence", source="conj")
@article{Krakowski_2023, title={Why Do People Use Informal Justice? Experimental Evidence from Kosovo}, volume={11}, ISSN={2052-2649}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2023.18}, DOI={10.1017/xps.2023.18}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Experimental Political Science}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Krakowski, Krzysztof and Kursani, Shpend}, year={2023}, month=July, pages={251–261} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |