4,182 rated or chosen profiles from 1,071 respondents, in up to 2 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 3 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the pairs table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Paired text-vignette experiment in which 1,071 Mexico City residents (online survey, Aug 2021) rated two colonias described by a neighbourhood problem, the neighbours' response and its result, for two vignette sets; outcomes: how difficult organizing around a new problem would be (1-5) and whether the neighbours would organize (0/1). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Chriswell, K., & Huberts, A. (2023). Collective action infrastructure: The downstream effects of urban neighborhood organizing. Comparative Political Studies. |
| DOI | 10.1177/00104140231193018 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/A8THZ9 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,071 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 4,182 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 2 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 3 |
| Topic | housing neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | MX |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | es |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): The private neighbours' response and the result text are conditional on the problem: 'compartir su agua y pedir pipas privadas' and the water results occur only with the water problem, 'monitorear la colonia' and the crime results only with shootings. Hence the two private responses have ~12-13% each against ~25% for the shared levels. |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| rating | How difficult do you think it would be for the neighbors to organize in the first/second colonia? (translated) [rating, 1 (Extremely difficult) to 5 (Extremely easy)] |
|---|---|
| rating_organize | Which colonia(s) do you think the neighbors will organize? (translated; 1 = this colonia named alone or in 'Both', 0 = not) [rating, 0 (not named) to 1 (named)] |
attr_neighbors_responseattr_problemattr_resultcov_agecov_alcaldiacov_educationcov_gendercov_housing_ownershipcov_housing_typecov_know_neighborscov_pol_natcov_time_neighborhoodidprofileratingrating_organizetasktrial_problem_asked
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("chriswell_2023_organizing_pairs", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("chriswell_2023_organizing_pairs", source="conj")
@article{Chriswell_2023, title={Collective Action Infrastructure: The Downstream Effects of Urban Neighborhood Organizing}, volume={57}, ISSN={1552-3829}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00104140231193018}, DOI={10.1177/00104140231193018}, number={7}, journal={Comparative Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Chriswell, Kaitlyn and Huberts, Alyssa}, year={2023}, month=Sept, pages={1175–1209} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |