1,931 rated or chosen profiles from 966 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 4 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the formal table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Paired text-vignette experiment in which 966 Mexico City residents (online survey, Aug 2021) rated two colonias described by a problem, the neighbours' response, whether a regular neighbours' group was formed, and the result; outcomes: difficulty of organizing without the government and to ask the government for help (1-5 each). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Chriswell, K., & Huberts, A. (2023). Collective action infrastructure: The downstream effects of urban neighborhood organizing. Comparative Political Studies. |
| DOI | 10.1177/00104140231193018 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/A8THZ9 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 966 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 1,931 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 4 |
| Topic | housing neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | MX |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | es |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): The private response ('compartir su agua y pedir pipas privadas' vs 'monitorear la colonia entre ellos') and the result texts are conditional on the problem (water vs shootings). The monitoring text occurs in two spellings (doubled space, 14%; doubled 'para', 4%). |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| rating | How difficult do you think it would be for the neighbors to organize among themselves, without the government, in the first/second colonia? (translated) [rating, 1 (Extremely difficult) to 5 (Extremely easy)] |
|---|---|
| rating_government | How difficult do you think it would be for the neighbors to organize to ask the government for help in the first/second colonia? (translated) [rating, 1 (Extremely difficult) to 5 (Extremely easy)] |
attr_groupattr_neighbors_responseattr_problemattr_resultcov_agecov_alcaldiacov_educationcov_gendercov_housing_ownershipcov_housing_typecov_know_neighborscov_pol_natcov_time_neighborhoodidprofileratingrating_governmenttasktrial_problem_asked
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("chriswell_2023_organizing_formal", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("chriswell_2023_organizing_formal", source="conj")
@article{Chriswell_2023, title={Collective Action Infrastructure: The Downstream Effects of Urban Neighborhood Organizing}, volume={57}, ISSN={1552-3829}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00104140231193018}, DOI={10.1177/00104140231193018}, number={7}, journal={Comparative Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Chriswell, Kaitlyn and Huberts, Alyssa}, year={2023}, month=Sept, pages={1175–1209} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |