trees_sirt

5,805 responses from 387 respondents to 15 items.

About this table

DescriptionFifteen forest managers (items) classified 387 trees (ids) for removal.
ReferencePommerening, A., Pallarés Ramos, C., Kędziora, W., Haufe, J., & Stoyan, D. (2018). Rating experiments in forestry: How much agreement is there in tree marking?. PLoS One, 13(3), e0194747.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0194747
LicenceGPL-3.0
Source datahttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sirt/index.html

Size and shape

Responses5,805
Respondents387
Items15
Response categories2
Responses per respondent15
Responses per item387
Density1
LongitudinalFALSE

Classification

age rangeAdult (18+)
sampleTargeted/specific
construct typeOpinion/attitude
measurement toolSurvey/questionnaire
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng
construct nameopinion on thinning trees

Columns

iditemresp

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python:

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("trees_sirt")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("trees_sirt")

Version and provenance

IRW versionv393
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse v53.0
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/4g08-xt41
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv53.0
Metadata sourceirw_meta v23.0