760 comparisons among 9 agents.
| Description | Mathematicians' comparative judgements of which of two proofs is more explanatory: 9 proofs, 38 judges, 760 decisions in two groups (Auckland, Rutgers); agent_a = proof chosen. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Mejía Ramos, J. P., Evans, T., Rittberg, C., & Inglis, M. (2021). Mathematicians' assessments of the explanatory value of proofs. Axiomathes, 31(5), 575-599. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10516-021-09545-8 |
| Licence | CC BY-NC 4.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.12458486.v1 |
| Comparisons | 760 |
|---|---|
| Agents | 9 |
agent_aagent_bdategrouphomefieldratertime_takenwinner
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0 — non-commercial use only.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("ramos_2021_proof_explanation", source = "comp")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("ramos_2021_proof_explanation", source="comp")
@article{Mej_a_Ramos_2021, title={Mathematicians’ Assessments of the Explanatory Value of Proofs}, volume={31}, ISSN={1572-8390}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09545-8}, DOI={10.1007/s10516-021-09545-8}, number={5}, journal={Axiomathes}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Mejía Ramos, Juan Pablo and Evans, Tanya and Rittberg, Colin and Inglis, Matthew}, year={2021}, month=Mar, pages={575–599} }
| IRW version | v607 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_competitions v6.3 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/7qpg-cj26 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v6.3 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v47.0 |