raman_2022_covid_booster

10,605 rated or chosen profiles from 2,121 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 1 profile varying on 5 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionUS Lucid respondents (December 2021) each evaluated 5 hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine (or booster) profiles one at a time, varying efficacy, protection duration, protection against future variants, manufacturer and financial incentive, after a randomized Omicron information prime. 2,121 respondents; would-get-it choice and a 1-7 likelihood rating.
ReferenceRaman, S., Kriner, D., Ziebarth, N., Simon, K., & Kreps, S. (2022). COVID-19 booster uptake among US adults: Assessing the impact of vaccine attributes, incentives, and context in a choice-based experiment. Social Science & Medicine, 310, 115277.
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115277
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DMIMUL

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents2,121
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)10,605
Tasks per respondent (most)5
Profiles per task1
Attributes5
Tasks with no profile chosen4,271

Design

Topichealth covid
A profile representsproduct service
CountryUS
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsunknown
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choiceIf you had to choose, would you choose to get this vaccine [booster]? [choice, opt-out allowed]
ratingHow likely or unlikely would you be to get the vaccine [booster] d... (Stata label truncated) [rating, 1 (Extremely unlikely) to 7 (Extremely likely)]

Columns

attr_durationattr_efficacyattr_incentiveattr_manufacturerattr_protectionchoicecov_agecov_booster_statuscov_duration_seccov_educationcov_gendercov_ideologycov_incomecov_party_idcov_party_leancov_race_1cov_race_2cov_race_3cov_race_4cov_race_5cov_race_6cov_statecov_vax_statusidprofileratingtasktrial_omicron_info

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("raman_2022_covid_booster", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("raman_2022_covid_booster", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Raman_2022, title={COVID-19 booster uptake among US adults: Assessing the impact of vaccine attributes, incentives, and context in a choice-based experiment}, volume={310}, ISSN={0277-9536}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115277}, DOI={10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115277}, journal={Social Science &amp; Medicine}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Raman, Shyam and Kriner, Douglas and Ziebarth, Nicolas and Simon, Kosali and Kreps, Sarah}, year={2022}, month=Oct, pages={115277} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv607
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v47.0