1,000 rated or chosen profiles from 1,000 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.
| Description | 1,000 US Latino adults read a fictional news article about a hunger-relief program officials might cut, with the program's scope (US vs other countries) and the recipients' photo location (Pennsylvania/New Mexico/Africa/Latin America) randomized; outcomes are keep-vs-cut support, moral obligation and closeness. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Prather, L. (2020). Transnational ties and support for foreign aid. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 133-147. |
| DOI | 10.1093/isq/sqz096 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/S0VCUQ |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,000 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 1,000 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 2 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 258 |
| Topic | international economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): the photo caption is nested in the program scope: domestic program shows Pennsylvania or New Mexico, foreign program shows Africa or Latin America |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | Officials are considering cutting the program: should they cut the program or not cut it? (paraphrase; 1 = should not cut) [choice, opt-out allowed] |
|---|---|
| rating_closeness | How close do you feel, in terms of your ideas and interests, to the recipients of the program? (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Not close) to 4 (Very close)] |
| rating_obligation | Do you agree or disagree that the US government has a moral obligation to assist the recipients of this program? [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (Strongly agree)] |
attr_photo_locationattr_program_scopechoicecov_agecov_education_codecov_full_employmentcov_gendercov_govtrust_codecov_low_incomecov_religiosity_codecov_republicancov_tiescov_whiteidprofilerating_closenessrating_obligationtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("prather_2020_foreign_aid_latino", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("prather_2020_foreign_aid_latino", source="conj")
@article{Prather_2020, title={Transnational Ties and Support for Foreign Aid}, volume={64}, ISSN={1468-2478}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz096}, DOI={10.1093/isq/sqz096}, number={1}, journal={International Studies Quarterly}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Prather, Lauren}, year={2020}, month=Jan, pages={133–147} }
| IRW version | v607 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.5 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/g2hc-zw49 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v47.0 |