258 rated or chosen profiles from 258 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.
| Description | German state-parliament MPs (n=258) each read one coalition-negotiation vignette from a 2x2 factorial design (pressure to reach a decision high/low x election campaign imminent/far away) and rated, on 1-5 scales, how likely they were to publicize the negotiation through various channels, to keep it confidential, and to compromise; realism and manipulation-check ratings are included. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Philipps, G. (2024). Compromise-building in the spotlight of the media? Individual and situational influences on the self-mediatization of parliamentary negotiations. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2), 570-590. |
| DOI | 10.1177/19401612221132719 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SD9M5A |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 258 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 258 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 2 |
| Topic | political communication |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | scenario |
| Country | DE |
| Language shown | de |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| rating_agree_nondisclosure | How likely would the following actions be in the period until the next round of negotiations? If the responsible representatives of the coalition partner try to initiate an arrangement with my party not to publish any information about the negotiation in the period until the next round of negotiations, I would agree to that. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
|---|---|
| rating_check_campaign | Which of the following statements regarding the conditions stated in the situation description is (rather) true? In the situation description, it was stated, ... (translated) [rating, 1 (... that the election campaign is imminent, and therefore public attention is increased.) to 5 (... that the election campaign is still far away, and therefore the public attention is average.)] |
| rating_check_pressure | Which of the following statements regarding the conditions stated in the situation description is (rather) true? In the situation description, it was stated, ... (translated) [rating, 1 (... that there is no high pressure to reach a decision, as the draft law is aimed at a problem of little relevance.) to 5 (... that there is a high pressure to reach a decision, as the draft law is aimed at a problem of great relevance.)] |
| rating_compromise | How likely would it be that you, as a negotiator, would do the following in the next round of negotiations? In the next round of negotiations, I would work towards a compromise, even if this means giving up my party's position to some extent. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_end_without_agreement | How likely would it be that you, as a negotiator, would do the following in the next round of negotiations? I would also end the next round of negotiations without an agreement if significant concessions to the coalition partner are necessary to reach an agreement. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_info_interview | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would publish information about the negotiation of the draft law in an interview. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_info_journalists | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would make information about the negotiation of the draft law public by providing certain journalists with corresponding information. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_info_press_release | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would publish information about the negotiation of the draft law through a press release/written statement. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_info_social | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would publish information about the negotiation of the draft law on social media platforms, such as Twitter or Facebook. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_info_website | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would publish information about the negotiation of the draft law on my website. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_initiate_nondisclosure | How likely would the following actions be in the period until the next round of negotiations? I would try to initiate an arrangement with the responsible representatives of the coalition partner not to publish any information about the negotiation until the next round of negotiations. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_keep_confidential | How likely would the following actions be in the period until the next round of negotiations? I would try together with the coalition partner to keep the contents of the negotiation confidential in the period until the next round of negotiations. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_position_interview | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would advertise my faction's position regarding the draft law in an interview. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_position_journalists | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would advertise my faction's position regarding the draft law by providing certain journalists with corresponding information. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_position_press_release | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would advertise my faction's position regarding the draft law through a press release/written statement. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_position_social | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would advertise my faction's position regarding the draft law on social media platforms, such as Twitter or Facebook. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_position_website | In the period until the next round of negotiations, ... I would advertise my faction's position regarding the draft law on my website. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_reach_agreement | How likely would it be that you, as a negotiator, would do the following in the next round of negotiations? In the next round of negotiations, I would try to reach an agreement in any case. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
| rating_realism_can_occur | If you compare the situation described with your experience in parliament, how much do you agree with the following statements? A comparable situation can occur in reality in German state-level parliaments. (translated) [rating, 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely)] |
| rating_realism_experienced | If you compare the situation described with your experience in parliament, how much do you agree with the following statements? I have experienced a comparable situation before. (translated) [rating, 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely)] |
| rating_realism_imagine | If you compare the situation described with your experience in parliament, how much do you agree with the following statements? I could imagine myself in the situation well. (translated) [rating, 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely)] |
| rating_realism_others_experienced | If you compare the situation described with your experience in parliament, how much do you agree with the following statements? Many state-level MPs of governing factions have experienced a comparable situation before. (translated) [rating, 1 (do not agree at all) to 5 (agree completely)] |
| rating_stick_to_position | How likely would it be that you, as a negotiator, would do the following in the next round of negotiations? In the next round of negotiations, I would stick to my party's position in any case. (translated) [rating, 1 (not likely at all) to 5 (very likely)] |
attr_decision_pressureattr_election_campaigncov_agecov_comm_background_talkscov_comm_interviewcov_comm_press_releasecov_comm_social_mediacov_comm_websitecov_factioncov_gendercov_governing_factionidprofilerating_agree_nondisclosurerating_check_campaignrating_check_pressurerating_compromiserating_end_without_agreementrating_info_interviewrating_info_journalistsrating_info_press_releaserating_info_socialrating_info_websiterating_initiate_nondisclosurerating_keep_confidentialrating_position_interviewrating_position_journalistsrating_position_press_releaserating_position_socialrating_position_websiterating_reach_agreementrating_realism_can_occurrating_realism_experiencedrating_realism_imaginerating_realism_others_experiencedrating_stick_to_positiontask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("philipps_2022_self_mediatization", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("philipps_2022_self_mediatization", source="conj")
@article{Philipps_2022, title={Compromise-Building in the Spotlight of the Media? Individual and Situational Influences on the Self-Mediatization of Parliamentary Negotiations}, volume={29}, ISSN={1940-1620}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19401612221132719}, DOI={10.1177/19401612221132719}, number={2}, journal={The International Journal of Press/Politics}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Philipps, Gerrit}, year={2022}, month=Oct, pages={570–590} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |