7,348 rated or chosen profiles from 7,348 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 8 attributes.
| Description | US online respondents in three experiments (n = 7,348) each read one hypothetical US economic-statecraft proposal (sanctions or inducements) against a target country, with randomized target, bad behaviour, country background, economic effect, outcome of inaction, rationale and proposal author; six 0-100 ratings (support, US interests, cost, effectiveness, US strength, message). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Peterson, T. M., & Miller, S. M. (2024). Contextualizing individual attitudes on economic statecraft. Foreign Policy Analysis, 20(3), orae016. |
| DOI | 10.1093/fpa/orae016 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z85LLW |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 7,348 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 7,348 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Topic | foreign policy security |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): country set and second bad behaviour differ by experiment; background text matches the behaviour; rationale text (positive/encouraging vs negative/pressuring) follows the policy (inducements vs sanctions); inaction and author-expertise texts name the target country |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| rating | I support the proposed policy [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
|---|---|
| rating_effective | This policy will be effective in changing [country]'s behavior [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
| rating_message | This policy sends a strong message to the international community about US commitment to [democracy promotion / end nuclear proliferation / end state sponsorship of terrorism / end narcotics trafficking] [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
| rating_too_costly | This policy is too costly to the US [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
| rating_us_interests | This policy advances US interests [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
| rating_us_strength | This policy demonstrates US strength [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
attr_authorattr_backgroundattr_behaviourattr_countryattr_economyattr_inactionattr_policyattr_rationaleattrpos_authorattrpos_economyattrpos_inactionattrpos_rationalecov_agecov_education_codecov_ethnicity_codecov_fav_afghanistancov_fav_argentinacov_fav_canadacov_fav_chinacov_fav_colombiacov_fav_cubacov_fav_egyptcov_fav_indiacov_fav_irancov_fav_mexicocov_fav_moroccocov_fav_myanmarcov_fav_north_koreacov_fav_pakistancov_fav_russiacov_fav_south_africacov_fav_sudancov_fav_syriacov_fav_ukcov_gender_codecov_hispanic_codecov_party_idcov_party_leancov_party_strength_demcov_party_strength_repcov_urban_ruralidprofileratingrating_effectiverating_messagerating_too_costlyrating_us_interestsrating_us_strengthtasktrial_experiment
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("peterson_2024_economic_statecraft", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("peterson_2024_economic_statecraft", source="conj")
@article{Peterson_2024, title={Contextualizing Individual Attitudes on Economic Statecraft}, volume={20}, ISSN={1743-8594}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orae016}, DOI={10.1093/fpa/orae016}, number={3}, journal={Foreign Policy Analysis}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Peterson, Timothy M and Miller, Susan M}, year={2024}, month=Apr }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |