21,472 rated or chosen profiles from 1,195 respondents, in up to 9 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
| Description | Dutch adults (May 2024; 1,195 respondents) chose which of two hypothetical conversations about a risk they would rather take part in, over an example pair plus 8 pairs, described by topic, the other person's gender, relation and closeness to the respondent, and the person's apparent knowledge, concern and motivation. Forced choice. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Perlstein, S., Kantorowicz, J., & Kuipers, S. (2025). Preferences for risk conversations in everyday life: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 28(6), 611-627. |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2025.2526479 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BU8VHO |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,195 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 21,472 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 9 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | social identity interpersonal |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | scenario |
| Country | NL |
| Language shown | nl |
| Language of stored levels | nl |
| Randomization restrictions | observed in the data (not documented by the source): Not documented. Never within a profile: relation 'vriend/vriendin (platonisch)' x closeness 'niet hecht'; concern 'niet bezorgd' x motivation 'u te overtuigen om meer maatregelen te nemen' or 'zich minder ongerust voelen'; motivation 'u te overtuigen om minder maatregelen te nemen' x concern 'redelijk bezorgd' or 'zeer bezorgd'. Shares: 'niet hecht' 18% of closeness, 'niet bezorgd' 16% of concern, 'minder maatregelen' 17% of motivation, 'vriend/vriendin' 27% of relation; other attributes near uniform. |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | In welk gesprek zou u liever willen deelnemen? [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_closenessattr_concernattr_genderattr_knowledgeattr_motivationattr_relationattr_topicattrpos_closenessattrpos_concernattrpos_genderattrpos_knowledgeattrpos_motivationattrpos_relationattrpos_topicchoicecov_att_checkcov_att_check2cov_att_check3cov_birth_yearcov_duration_seccov_education_codecov_gender_codecov_information_seeking_codecov_risk_talk_codeidprofiletasktrial_example
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("perlstein_2025_risk_conversations", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("perlstein_2025_risk_conversations", source="conj")
@article{Perlstein_2025, title={Preferences for risk conversations in everyday life: a conjoint analysis}, volume={28}, ISSN={1466-4461}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2526479}, DOI={10.1080/13669877.2025.2526479}, number={6}, journal={Journal of Risk Research}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Perlstein, Sara and Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw and Kuipers, Sanneke}, year={2025}, month=June, pages={611–627} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |