15,580 rated or chosen profiles from 1,558 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
One of 6 tables from the same source; this one is the pl table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Adults in Poland (online survey, June-August 2021, n = 1558) chose between two hypothetical ministers in each of 5 paired tasks (Prime Minister, Finance, Foreign Affairs, Agriculture, Education) varying age, gender, class background, prior occupation, party membership, accountability and policy position. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Panel, S., Paulis, E., Pilet, J.-B., Rojon, S., & Vittori, D. (2024). The lure of technocrats: A conjoint experiment on preferences for technocratic ministers in six European countries. Political Behavior, 46, 1961-1984. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-023-09904-8 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RZTIOY |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,558 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 15,580 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | PL |
| Language shown | unknown |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Occupation and policy-position levels are drawn from post-specific sets (e.g. 'Minister of Agriculture (Rural Affairs)' and 'Professor of agronomy in a university' only in the Agriculture task; two policy positions per post); education is constant ('Phd'). |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | The respondent's preferred profile of the two (paraphrase of the codebook; wording not deposited) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_accountabilityattr_ageattr_educationattr_genderattr_occupationattr_parentsattr_party_memberattr_policychoicecov_age_groupcov_attention_passcov_duration_seccov_educationcov_gendercov_issue_priority_1cov_issue_priority_2cov_issue_priority_3cov_issue_priority_4cov_policy_pref_1cov_policy_pref_10cov_policy_pref_2cov_policy_pref_3cov_policy_pref_4cov_policy_pref_5cov_policy_pref_6cov_policy_pref_7cov_policy_pref_8cov_policy_pref_9cov_survey_weightidprofiletasktrial_post
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("panel_2023_technocrats_pl", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("panel_2023_technocrats_pl", source="conj")
@article{Panel_2023, title={The Lure of Technocrats: A Conjoint Experiment on Preferences for Technocratic Ministers in Six European Countries}, volume={46}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09904-8}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-023-09904-8}, number={3}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Panel, S. and Paulis, E. and Pilet, J.-B. and Rojon, S. and Vittori, D.}, year={2023}, month=Nov, pages={1961–1984} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |