8,408 rated or chosen profiles from 1,051 respondents, in up to 4 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description	US online respondents (n = 1,051) each judged 4 pairs of hypothetical persons described by 6 randomized partisanship-related attributes (parents' party, party activity, reaction to criticism of the party, issue opinions, voting habits, vote intention), choosing which is more of a Democrat (or Republican, by arm) and rating each on a 7-point scale.
Reference	Ogura, I., Miwa, H., & Iida, T. (2022). What do you mean by "Democrat" and "Republican"? Evidence from a conjoint experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 34(1), edab025.
DOI	10.1093/ijpor/edab025
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3NZZXU

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice: which of two persons is more of a Democrat (Democrat arm) or Republican (Republican arm), forced, no opt-out; rating: 7-point partisanship rating of each person, kept raw (anchors not in the deposit; the authors' code implies 1 = Democrat end, 7 = Republican end in both arms). Wording paraphrased (Online Appendix A not deposited). Attribute order randomized per respondent (attrpos_). All 1,051 respondents kept with trial_page_seconds and two attention-check covariates; the authors analyse 864 attentive respondents.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Design

Topic	social identity interpersonal
A profile represents	person
Country	US
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which of these two persons is more of a Democrat [Democrat arm] / Republican [Republican arm]? (paraphrase) [choice, forced]
rating	Rating of each person's partisanship on a 7-point scale (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_criticismattr_parents_partyattr_party_activitiesattr_policy_opinionsattr_vote_intentionattr_voting_habitsattrpos_criticismattrpos_parents_partyattrpos_party_activitiesattrpos_policy_opinionsattrpos_vote_intentionattrpos_voting_habitschoicecov_age_groupcov_attention_pass_directedcov_attention_pass_imccov_education_codecov_gendercov_incomecov_occupationcov_party_id_codecov_party_leancov_party_strength_demcov_party_strength_repcov_race_codecov_religioncov_religious_attendancecov_state_codecov_vote_intent_2016idprofileratingtasktrial_conditiontrial_page_seconds

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("ogura_2022_partisan_labels", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("ogura_2022_partisan_labels", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Ogura_2021, title={What Do You Mean by “Democrat” and “Republican”? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment}, volume={34}, ISSN={1471-6909}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab025}, DOI={10.1093/ijpor/edab025}, number={1}, journal={International Journal of Public Opinion Research}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Ogura, Ikuma and Miwa, Hirofumi and Iida, Takeshi}, year={2021}, month=Nov }

Respondents	1,051
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	8,408
Tasks per respondent (most)	4
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0

ogura_2022_partisan_labels