ocampo_2025_latinos_american

15,000 rated or chosen profiles from 1,500 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionPaired conjoint on who counts as American: 1,500 US adults (750 White, 750 Black respondents, 2020) compared 5 pairs of profiles of people from immigrant families varying photo (skin tone x gender), immigration background, self-identification, language, education, profession, religion, party and spouse; outcomes are a forced choice of the more American person and a 1-7 rating of how American each is.
ReferenceOcampo-Roland, A. N. (2025). Group prototypicality and boundary definition: Comparing White and Black perceptions of whether Latinos are American. American Political Science Review, 119(4), 1581-1598.
DOI10.1017/s000305542400131x
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CXT4YN

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents1,500
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)15,000
Tasks per respondent (most)5
Profiles per task2
Attributes9
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicsocial identity interpersonal
A profile representsperson
CountryUS
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsyes (stated by the source): authors' cjoint design (3_amce_and_marginal_means_by_race.R constraint_list): no Doctor/IT professional/Teacher with high school dropout or graduate; no Doctor with Bachelor's degree; no US-born (parents/grandparents) with 'Does not speak English'; no immigrant/naturalized/undocumented with 'Only speaks English'; no IT/Doctor/Sales manager/Teacher with 'Does not speak English'; no White/Light/Medium face with identity Black; no Brown/Black face with identity White. Level probabilities: Political 2/9,2/9,2/9 and 3/9 Not political; Spouse 5/15 Not married, 3/15 American, 2/15 Black, 2/15 White, 3/15 same; other attributes uniform before constraints
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.

Outcomes:

choiceThese two people are either immigrants or come from a family with a history of immigration. If you had to choose between them, which of them do you personally believe is more American? [choice, forced]
ratingOn a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates that you would not rate this person as American at all and 7 indicates that you would very much rate this person as American, how would you rate each person? [rating, 1 (would not rate this person as American at all) to 7 (would very much rate this person as American)]

Columns

attr_backgroundattr_educationattr_facesattr_identifiesattr_languageattr_politicalattr_professionattr_religionattr_spousechoicecov_birth_yearcov_educationcov_employcov_faminc_newcov_gendercov_ideo5cov_party_id7cov_presvote16postcov_q4_3cov_q4_5_2cov_q7_2cov_q7_3cov_q7_4cov_racecov_religpewcov_survey_weightcov_voteregidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("ocampo_2025_latinos_american", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("ocampo_2025_latinos_american", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{OCAMPO_ROLAND_2025, title={Group Prototypicality and Boundary Definition: Comparing White and Black Perceptions of Whether Latinos Are American}, volume={119}, ISSN={1537-5943}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s000305542400131x}, DOI={10.1017/s000305542400131x}, number={4}, journal={American Political Science Review}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={OCAMPO-ROLAND, ANGIE N.}, year={2025}, month=Jan, pages={1581–1598} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0