4,788 rated or chosen profiles from 640 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 4 attributes.

About this table

Description	Stated-choice experiment: 640 beach recreationists at eight Catalan beaches (2012) chose between two hypothetical beaches (jellyfish bloom risk, water transparency, services, extra travel time) or doing something else; 1-5 answered cards each.
Reference	Nunes, P. A. L. D., Loureiro, M. L., Pinol, L., Sastre, S., Voltaire, L., & Canepa, A. (2015). Analyzing beach recreationists' preferences for the reduction of jellyfish blooms: Economic results from a stated-choice experiment in Catalonia, Spain. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0126681.
DOI	10.1371/journal.pone.0126681
Licence	CC BY 4.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1372408

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). Choice among two hypothetical beaches described by jellyfish bloom risk, water transparency, services and extra travel time, or a third option (stay at home or do another activity) that has no attributes and is an opt-out (chosen in 105 of 2,394 answered cards). Level text is from the article's Table 2, except extra travel time, which keeps the deposit's proportions 0.2/0.3/0.4 of reported travel time (the article lists +5%/+10%/+15%; not reconcilable). Cards with no recorded choice (497) and one card with two choices are omitted; 640 of the 644 respondents remain.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	640
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	4,788
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	4
Tasks with no profile chosen	105

Design

Topic	climate energy environment
A profile represents	place
Country	ES
Language shown	ca, es, en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Choice of Beach A, Beach B, or a third option (stay at home or do any other recreational activity) on a hypothetical day of leisure (paraphrase) [choice, opt-out allowed]

Columns

attr_extra_travel_timeattr_jellyfish_riskattr_servicesattr_water_transparencychoicecov_agecov_gendercov_siteidprofiletasktrial_survey_type

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("nunes_2015_jellyfish_beach", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("nunes_2015_jellyfish_beach", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Nunes_2015, title={Analyzing Beach Recreationists’ Preferences for the Reduction of Jellyfish Blooms: Economic Results from a Stated-Choice Experiment in Catalonia, Spain}, volume={10}, ISSN={1932-6203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126681}, DOI={10.1371/journal.pone.0126681}, number={6}, journal={PLOS ONE}, publisher={Public Library of Science (PLoS)}, author={Nunes, Paulo A. L. D. and Loureiro, Maria L. and Piñol, Laia and Sastre, Sergio and Voltaire, Louinord and Canepa, Antonio}, editor={Thuesen, Erik V.}, year={2015}, month=June, pages={e0126681} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0