13,800 rated or chosen profiles from 690 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
| Description | 690 US partisans each chose between 10 pairs of hypothetical congressional candidates varying party, prior office, public support for QAnon, gender, impeachment, infrastructure, tax and border-wall positions, and rated each candidate's favorability or perceived ideology (7-point; one rating per respondent). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Noble, B. S., & Carlson, T. N. (2024). CueAnon: What QAnon signals about congressional candidates and what it costs them. Political Behavior. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-024-09957-3 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UVVSIR |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 690 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 13,800 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Which candidate do you prefer? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_favor | Favorability of the candidate, 7-point (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)] |
| rating_ideology | Perceived ideology of the candidate (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (extremely liberal) to 7 (extremely conservative)] |
attr_border_wallattr_genderattr_impeachmentattr_infrastructureattr_partyattr_prior_officeattr_qanonattr_taxeschoicecov_agecov_alt_right_newscov_antiestablishment_1cov_antiestablishment_10cov_antiestablishment_11cov_antiestablishment_12cov_antiestablishment_13cov_antiestablishment_14cov_antiestablishment_2cov_antiestablishment_3cov_antiestablishment_4cov_antiestablishment_5cov_antiestablishment_6cov_antiestablishment_7cov_antiestablishment_8cov_antiestablishment_9cov_believe_qcov_employedcov_fox4cov_gendercov_ideocov_resp_pid7cov_trustidprofilerating_favorrating_ideologytask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("noble_2024_qanon_candidates", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("noble_2024_qanon_candidates", source="conj")
@article{Noble_2024, title={CueAnon: What QAnon Signals About Congressional Candidates and What it Costs Them}, volume={47}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09957-3}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-024-09957-3}, number={1}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Noble, Benjamin S. and Carlson, Taylor N.}, year={2024}, month=July, pages={435–456} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |