34,680 rated or chosen profiles from 4,354 respondents, in up to 4 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
| Description | Online panel respondents in Brazil, Germany, Italy, Poland and the US (Sep-Dec 2020, n=4,354) chose in 4 tasks which of two hypothetical persons should be prioritized for a COVID-19 vaccine; persons varied gender, age, children, job, citizenship, pre-existing condition and early registration; forced choice. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Munzert, S., Ramirez-Ruiz, S., Çalı, B., Stoetzer, L. F., Gohdes, A., & Lowe, W. (2022). Prioritization preferences for COVID-19 vaccination are consistent across five countries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 439. |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-022-01392-1 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OAMAOE |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 4,354 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 34,680 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 4 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | health covid |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | BR, DE, IT, PL, US |
| Language shown | pt, de, it, pl, en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Job level 'Teacher' exists only in the German survey (other countries: 5 job levels); otherwise levels completely randomized. hence the lower share of Teacher in the pooled table |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Please look at the profiles of the two persons thoroughly and then make your decision. Note: Please assume that the vaccine is both safe and effective, i.e. does not have serious adverse effects and protects the person reliably from getting COVID-19. Which person would you prioritize for access to the vaccine? [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_ageattr_citizenshipattr_early_registrationattr_genderattr_has_childrenattr_jobattr_preexisting_conditionchoicecov_birth_yearcov_countrycov_educationcov_gendercov_health_conditioncov_languagecov_leftrightcov_preconditioncov_trust_fedgovcov_trust_hccov_trust_mediacov_trust_scicov_trust_stategovidprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("munzert_2022_vaccine_priority", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("munzert_2022_vaccine_priority", source="conj")
@article{Munzert_2022, title={Prioritization preferences for COVID-19 vaccination are consistent across five countries}, volume={9}, ISSN={2662-9992}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01392-1}, DOI={10.1057/s41599-022-01392-1}, number={1}, journal={Humanities and Social Sciences Communications}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Munzert, Simon and Ramirez-Ruiz, Sebastian and Çalı, Başak and Stoetzer, Lukas F. and Gohdes, Anita and Lowe, Will}, year={2022}, month=Dec }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |