mummolo_2021_partisan_loyalty

42,210 rated or chosen profiles from 3,015 respondents, in up to 7 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionUS Democrats and Republicans (online panel, July 2016) chose between 7 pairs of hypothetical candidates varying in party, gender, race and stances on Obamacare, Muslim immigration, corporate taxes, birth-control coverage and illegal immigration; 3,015 respondents, forced choice.
ReferenceMummolo, J., Peterson, E., & Westwood, S. (2021). The limits of partisan loyalty. Political Behavior, 43, 949-972.
DOI10.1007/s11109-019-09576-3
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/J9IJGM

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents3,015
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)42,210
Tasks per respondent (most)7
Profiles per task2
Attributes8
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topiccandidate choice
A profile representsperson
CountryUS
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsunknown
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choicerespondents evaluated two politicians and indicated which they preferred (paraphrase) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_economyattr_genderattr_healthcareattr_illegal_immigrationattr_partyattr_raceattr_terrorismattr_womens_equalityattrpos_economyattrpos_genderattrpos_healthcareattrpos_illegal_immigrationattrpos_partyattrpos_raceattrpos_terrorismattrpos_womens_equalitychoicecov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_hispaniccov_ideologycov_importance_birth_controlcov_importance_corporate_taxcov_importance_muslim_immigrationcov_importance_obamacarecov_importance_path_to_citizenshipcov_incomecov_party_idcov_party_strengthcov_racecov_stance_birth_controlcov_stance_corporate_taxcov_stance_deportationcov_stance_muslim_immigrationcov_stance_obamacarecov_stance_path_to_citizenshipcov_survey_weightcov_vote_2016idprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("mummolo_2021_partisan_loyalty", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("mummolo_2021_partisan_loyalty", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Mummolo_2019, title={The Limits of Partisan Loyalty}, volume={43}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09576-3}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-019-09576-3}, number={3}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Mummolo, Jonathan and Peterson, Erik and Westwood, Sean}, year={2019}, month=Nov, pages={949–972} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0