montal_2024_journal_choice

2,668 rated or chosen profiles from 445 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.

About this table

Description445 international-relations scholars based in Latin America each chose between two hypothetical journals to submit to in 3 tasks (8 attributes: methods relevance, audience, editorial location, response time, colleagues published, Scimago indexing, language, acceptance rate).
ReferenceMontal, F., Yamin, P., & Pauselli, G. (2024). A matter of journal choice: A conjoint experiment on submission choices of Latin American IR scholars. International Studies Perspectives, 25(3), 407-424.
DOI10.1093/isp/ekad025
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UJ5S1V

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents445
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)2,668
Tasks per respondent (most)3
Profiles per task2
Attributes8
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicother
A profile representsorganisation
Countryunknown
Language shownunknown
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsunknown
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choiceWhich of the two journals would you submit your article to? (paraphrase) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_acceptance_rateattr_audienceattr_editorial_locationattr_languageattr_methodsattr_peer_pressureattr_response_timeattr_scimagochoicecov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_q2_1cov_q2_11cov_q2_6cov_q2_7cov_q2_8cov_q2_9cov_q3_1_1cov_q3_1_2cov_q3_1_3cov_q3_1_4cov_q3_1_5cov_q3_1_6cov_q3_1_7cov_q3_1_8cov_q3_2_1cov_q3_2_10cov_q3_2_11cov_q3_2_12cov_q3_2_13cov_q3_2_14cov_q3_2_2cov_q3_2_3cov_q3_2_4cov_q3_2_5cov_q3_2_6cov_q3_2_7cov_q3_2_8cov_q3_2_9cov_q3_3cov_q3_4cov_q4_1_1cov_q4_2_1cov_q7_1cov_q7_2cov_q7_3cov_q7_3_1cov_q7_4cov_q7_5cov_q8_2idprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("montal_2024_journal_choice", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("montal_2024_journal_choice", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Montal_2024, title={A Matter of Journal Choice: A Conjoint Experiment on Submission Choices of Latin American IR Scholars}, volume={25}, ISSN={1528-3585}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad025}, DOI={10.1093/isp/ekad025}, number={3}, journal={International Studies Perspectives}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Montal, Florencia and Pauselli, Gino and Yamin, Patricio}, year={2024}, month=Jan, pages={407–424} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0