9,024 rated or chosen profiles from 1,504 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
| Description | Japanese online respondents (n = 1,504) saw 3 pairs of hypothetical candidates described by agree/neither/disagree positions on 8 policy issues and, depending on a randomized label arm, picked the more right-wing or the more left-wing candidate and placed each on a 1-10 left-right scale. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Miwa, H., Arami, R., & Taniguchi, M. (2023). Detecting voter understanding of ideological labels using a conjoint experiment. Political Behavior, 45(2). |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-021-09719-5 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FIHGN0 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,504 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 9,024 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 3 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | ja |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice_more_left | Which of the two candidates is more to the left? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| choice_more_right | Which of the two candidates is more to the right? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
| rating | Where would you place this candidate on the left-right scale? (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 10 (unknown)] |
attr_article9attr_defenseattr_foreign_workersattr_growthattr_samesex_marriageattr_stop_apologyattr_tax_richattr_womenattrpos_article9attrpos_defenseattrpos_foreign_workersattrpos_growthattrpos_samesex_marriageattrpos_stop_apologyattrpos_tax_richattrpos_womenchoice_more_leftchoice_more_rightcov_agecov_attention_pass_1cov_attention_pass_2cov_attitude_article9cov_attitude_defensecov_attitude_foreign_workerscov_attitude_growthcov_attitude_samesex_marriagecov_attitude_stop_apologycov_attitude_tax_richcov_attitude_womencov_education_codecov_gendercov_ideologycov_knowledgecov_prefecture_codeidprofileratingtasktrial_labeltrial_page_submit_sec
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("miwa_2021_ideological_labels", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("miwa_2021_ideological_labels", source="conj")
@article{Miwa_2021, title={Detecting Voter Understanding of Ideological Labels Using a Conjoint Experiment}, volume={45}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09719-5}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-021-09719-5}, number={2}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Miwa, Hirofumi and Arami, Reiko and Taniguchi, Masaki}, year={2021}, month=May, pages={635–657} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |