manekin_2019_disputed_territory

2,690 rated or chosen profiles from 1,345 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 4 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionIsraeli (Jewish) online respondents (n = 1,345) chose between two policy packages varying West Bank territorial control, rocket and terror attacks, the economy and the security/health/education budgets (one task), and rated each package 1-7.
ReferenceManekin, D. S., Grossman, G., & Mitts, T. (2019). Contested ground: Disentangling material and symbolic attachment to disputed territory. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(4), 679-697.
DOI10.1017/psrm.2018.22
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/INCWQN

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents1,345
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)2,690
Tasks per respondent (most)1
Profiles per task2
Attributes4
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicforeign policy security
A profile representspolicy
CountryIL
Language shownhe
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsyes (stated by the source): prohibited: attacks decrease significantly + security budget increase; attacks increase significantly + security budget decrease; attacks increase significantly + economy grows significantly (1.Main_results.R constraint_list); level shares unequal (security 'remain unchanged' 1,240 of 2,690 profiles)
Task orderinferred from row order
Profile positioninferred from row order

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choiceunknown [choice, forced]
ratingunknown [rating, 1 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_budgetsattr_economyattr_securityattr_territorychoicecov_age_groupcov_educationcov_ethnicitycov_gendercov_incomecov_regioncov_religiositycov_vote_2015idprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("manekin_2019_disputed_territory", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("manekin_2019_disputed_territory", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Manekin_2018, title={Contested Ground: Disentangling Material and Symbolic Attachment to Disputed Territory}, volume={7}, ISSN={2049-8489}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.22}, DOI={10.1017/psrm.2018.22}, number={04}, journal={Political Science Research and Methods}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Manekin, Devorah and Grossman, Guy and Mitts, Tamar}, year={2018}, month=June, pages={679–697} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0