9,282 rated or chosen profiles from 1,164 respondents, in up to 4 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
| Description | Paired city conjoint: 1,164 Mexican-born immigrants in the US (online, English or Spanish) chose between 4 pairs of destination cities varying jobs, rent, social network, share Mexican, local deportation policy, immigrant healthcare access and community type; also ten 0/1 judgements of each city (five per randomized question version). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Lueders, H. (2025). Local immigration policies shape immigrants' relocation preferences regardless of immigration status. Political Behavior. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-025-10080-0 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CFPFU7 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,164 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 9,282 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 4 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en, es |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of these two cities would you rather move to? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_alone | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Feel alone (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version B only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_discrimination | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Fear discrimination (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version B only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_econ_secure | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Be economically secure (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version A only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_gov_liberal | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Gov't is liberal (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version A only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_gov_protects | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Gov't protects immigrants (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version B only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_help | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Have many people who can help (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version A only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_opportunities | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Have many opportunities (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version B only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_quality_life | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: High quality of life (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version A only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_safe | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Be safe (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version A only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_trust_police | In this city, would you expect to / would this hold: Trust the police (paraphrase of the authors' figure label; asked in question version B only) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
attr_communityattr_deportationattr_healthcareattr_jobsattr_networkattr_rentattr_share_mexicanattrpos_communityattrpos_deportationattrpos_healthcareattrpos_jobsattrpos_networkattrpos_rentattrpos_share_mexicanchoicecov_agecov_age_groupcov_age_move_uscov_agree_deportationcov_agree_immistatuscov_attention_passcov_citizen_mexicocov_duration_seccov_educationcov_experiment_ordercov_family_unauthorizedcov_gendercov_hh_adultscov_income_quintilecov_know_deportedcov_question_versioncov_statecov_statuscov_survey_languagecov_survey_weightcov_trust_icecov_worries_deportationcov_years_usidprofilerating_alonerating_discriminationrating_econ_securerating_gov_liberalrating_gov_protectsrating_helprating_opportunitiesrating_quality_liferating_saferating_trust_policetask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("lueders_2025_relocation", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("lueders_2025_relocation", source="conj")
@article{Lueders_2025, title={Local Immigration Policies Shape Immigrants’ Relocation Preferences Regardless of Immigration Status}, volume={48}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10080-0}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-025-10080-0}, number={3}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Lueders, Hans}, year={2025}, month=Sept, pages={1505–1531} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |