40,016 rated or chosen profiles from 4,166 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description	4,166 Catalan online respondents (CEO Enquesta Sociopolitica 2022) judged 5 pairs of couples applying to adopt a child, varying the couple's sexuality (shown by names), open or closed relationship, age difference, education, family values and reason for adopting. Outcome: which couple should get a child first (forced choice).
Reference	López Ortega, A., Blanco Bosco, A., et al. (2025). Not so sexually modern after all: Homonegativity and prejudice against open and age-gap relationships (manuscript 24-0076.R2).
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/cbwkqa

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). Paired design (Catalonia, 2022): 5 tasks of 2 couples applying to adopt; attributes sexuality (two-men, two-women or man-woman couple, shown by names), open/closed relationship, age difference, education, family values, reason for adopting; choice = the couple that should be given a child first (forced). Sexuality and age difference are stored as the authors' categories (displayed as partner names and age pairs, listed in the level text); other level text is the supplement's, translated from Catalan. 822 tasks without a recorded choice omitted; CEO weight kept as cov_survey_weight.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	4,166
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	40,016
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	social identity interpersonal
A profile represents	person
Country	ES
Language shown	ca
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Below you will see a profile of two couples who have applied to adopt a child. Imagine that you are the person responsible for matching the child to one of the two couples. Which of these two couples do you think should be given a child for adoption first? (To couple 1 / To couple 2) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_ageattr_educationattr_family_valuesattr_reason_for_adoptionattr_relationshipattr_sexualitychoicecov_age_groupcov_gendercov_ideologycov_survey_weightidprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("lopezortega_2025_adoption_couples", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("lopezortega_2025_adoption_couples", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/cbwkqa,
  doi = {10.7910/DVN/CBWKQA},
  url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/CBWKQA},
  author = {Lopez Ortega, Alberto and Blanco Bosco, Agustín},
  keywords = {Social Sciences},
  title = {Replication Data for: "Not so modern after all: Homonegativity and prejudice against open and age-gap relationships"},
  publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
  year = {2024}
}

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0