2,401 rated or chosen profiles from 2,401 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.
One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the police_recruits table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | 2,401 Mexican online respondents read about more municipal police officers hired, with the officers' sex (female, or not named) and previous background (soldiers, private security, self-defence forces, human rights activists, migrants in the US, or none) randomized; outcomes: 1-4 faith that they catch criminals and 1-4 likelihood of abuses. |
|---|---|
| Reference | López García, A. I., Berens, S., & Maydom, B. (2023). MigCrimeMexSurvey 2021 [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/byavmc |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,401 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 2,401 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 2 |
| Topic | crime justice policing |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | MX |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| rating_abuse_likelihood | If the government recruited more municipal police officers <female> <background>, how likely do you think it would be that these agents would incur in activities (such as bribery, torture, discrimination, aggression, verbal abuse, sexual abuse or false arrest) when arresting criminals or investigating the case? [rating, 1 (Not likely) to 4 (Very likely)] |
|---|---|
| rating_faith | If authorities hire more <female> municipal police officers <background>, how much faith would you have that these policemen catch the criminals, if you were a victim of a robbery or assault? [rating, 1 (Not at all) to 4 (A lot)] |
attr_officer_backgroundattr_officer_sexcov_agecov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_stateidprofilerating_abuse_likelihoodrating_faithtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("lopezgarcia_2023_mx_police_recruits", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("lopezgarcia_2023_mx_police_recruits", source="conj")
@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/byavmc,
doi = {10.7910/DVN/BYAVMC},
url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/BYAVMC},
author = {Lopez Garcia, Ana Isabel and Berens, Sarah and Maydom, Barry},
keywords = {Social Sciences},
title = {Replication Data for: Emigration, Social Remittances and Fiscal Policy Preferences: Experimental Evidence from Mexico.},
publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
year = {2023}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |