20,152 responses from 916 respondents to 22 items.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the frq table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | 22-item Fragmented Reading Questionnaire (5-point Likert), Chinese university students, n=916 |
|---|---|
| Reference | Liu W, Huang H, Saleem A, Zhao Z (2022). The effects of university students' fragmented reading on cognitive development in the new media age: evidence from Chinese higher education. PeerJ. |
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.13861 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
| Source data | https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC9415515 |
| Responses | 20,152 |
|---|---|
| Respondents | 916 |
| Items | 22 |
| Response categories | 5 |
| Responses per respondent | 22 |
| Responses per item | 916 |
| Density | 1 |
| Longitudinal | FALSE |
| age range | Adult (18+) |
|---|---|
| sample | Educational |
| measurement tool | Survey/questionnaire |
| item format | Likert Scale/selected response |
| primary language(s) | chi |
This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.
| Instrument | Fragmented Reading Questionnaire (FRQ) |
|---|---|
| Mean words per item | 17.091 |
| Mean characters per item | 89.727 |
| Mean characters per response | 4 |
| Flesch-Kincaid grade level | 7.764 |
This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, liu_2022_fragmented_reading.py. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.
| Column | What it is | Source column |
|---|---|---|
| IRW standard columns | ||
id | IRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task). | Serial No. |
item | IRW standard Item identifier. | made in the build script |
resp | IRW standard Response value. | made in the build script |
| Respondent covariates | ||
cov_age | Covariate | N3 |
cov_c6 | Covariate | N6 |
cov_c7 | Covariate | N7 |
cov_degree_level | Covariate | N4 |
cov_gender | Covariate | N1 |
cov_grade | Covariate | N2 |
cov_major | Covariate | N5 |
What item codes and covariate values stand for is in the source’s questionnaire, peerj-10-13861-s002.docx, which shows the item wording.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("liu_2022_fragreading_frq")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("liu_2022_fragreading_frq")
@article{Liu_2022, title={The effects of university students’ fragmented reading on cognitive development in the new media age: evidence from Chinese higher education}, volume={10}, ISSN={2167-8359}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13861}, DOI={10.7717/peerj.13861}, journal={PeerJ}, publisher={PeerJ}, author={Liu, Wei and Huang, Heng and Saleem, Atif and Zhao, Zhongping}, year={2022}, month=Aug, pages={e13861} }
| IRW version | v549 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | item_response_warehouse_4 v13.0 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/w8zx-td92 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v13.0 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v39.0 |