32,470 rated or chosen profiles from 3,247 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the meat_rationing table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Paired conjoint on proposals to ration red meat in Sweden: 3,247 adults compared 5 pairs of rationing proposals varying stringency (0.6/1/1.4/1.8 kg/month), allowance allocation, tradability, price and whether the cap declines over time; outcomes are a forced choice and a 1-5 rating from strongly against to strongly in favor. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Lindgren, O., Jagers, S. C., & Lindvall, D. (2026). The impact of policy design on opposition to restrictive climate policies. Ecological Economics, 240. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108813 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E1FBRQ |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 3,247 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 32,470 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 5 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | climate energy environment |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | SE |
| Language shown | sv |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of the two proposals do you prefer? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | How strongly are you against or in favor of this proposal? (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly against) to 5 (Strongly in favor)] |
attr_allocationattr_capattr_priceattr_stringencyattr_tradechoicecov_agecov_attention_passcov_duration_seccov_educationcov_gendercov_leftrightcov_nuts2cov_q1cov_q10_1cov_q10_2cov_q10_3cov_q10_4cov_q10_5cov_q10_6cov_q4cov_q5cov_q6cov_q7_1cov_q7_2cov_q7_3cov_q7_4cov_q8_1cov_q8_2cov_regioncov_survey_weightidprofileratingtasktrial_block_position
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("lindgren_2026_meat_rationing", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("lindgren_2026_meat_rationing", source="conj")
@article{Lindgren_2026, title={The impact of policy design on opposition to restrictive climate policies}, volume={240}, ISSN={0921-8009}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108813}, DOI={10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108813}, journal={Ecological Economics}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Lindgren, Oskar and Jagers, Sverker C. and Lindvall, Daniel}, year={2026}, month=Feb, pages={108813} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |