lee_2024_skilled_immig_probability

2,038 rated or chosen profiles from 204 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the probability table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description204 members of the Hong Kong People Representative Panel (probability) each compared 5 pairs of highly-skilled immigration schemes varying eligibility, change of employment, nationality, language requirement, welfare entitlement, tax and quota; forced choice plus a 0-10 rating of each scheme.
ReferenceLee, S.-y. (2025). Procedure matters: The distinct attitudinal feedback effects of immigration policy. Political Behavior, 47(1), 191-215.
DOI10.1007/s11109-024-09947-5
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PPBS5T

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents204
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)2,038
Tasks per respondent (most)5
Profiles per task2
Attributes7
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicimmigration asylum
A profile representspolicy
CountryHK
Language shownzh
Language of stored levelszh
Randomization restrictionsobserved in the data (not documented by the source): nationality 'open to mainland Chinese citizens only' (只接受中國內地居民申請) never occurs with quota '40,000/year' (每年40,000人); authors model Nationality*Quota. Consequently nationality-mainland (~25%) and quota-40,000 (~25%) are less frequent than the other levels (~37%)
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positioninferred from row order

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choiceAttitudes toward immigrants [forced choice] (paraphrase) [choice, forced]
ratingAttitudes toward immigrants [rating] (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (unknown) to 10 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_eligibilityattr_employmentattr_languageattr_nationalityattr_quotaattr_taxattr_welfarechoicecov_educationcov_gendercov_identitycov_survey_weightcov_weight2idprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("lee_2024_skilled_immig_probability", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("lee_2024_skilled_immig_probability", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Lee_2024, title={Procedure Matters: The Distinct Attitudinal Feedback Effects of Immigration Policy}, volume={47}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09947-5}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-024-09947-5}, number={1}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Lee, Siu-yau}, year={2024}, month=June, pages={191–215} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0