koo_2016_comm_technique_opinion

2,970 responses from 211 respondents to 18 items.

About this table

Description18-item scale of nurse practitioners' opinions on the effectiveness of recommended health-literate communication techniques
ReferenceKoo LW, Horowitz AM, Radice SD, Wang MQ, Kleinman DV (2016) Nurse Practitioners' Use of Communication Techniques: Results of a Maryland Oral Health Literacy Survey. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0146545.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0146545
LicenceCC BY 4.0
Source datahttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146545.s001

Size and shape

Responses2,970
Respondents211
Items18
Response categories4
Responses per respondent14.076
Responses per item165
Density0.782
LongitudinalFALSE

Classification

sampleWorkplace
measurement toolSurvey/questionnaire
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng

Columns

iditemresp

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python:

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("koo_2016_comm_technique_opinion")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("koo_2016_comm_technique_opinion")

Version and provenance

IRW versionv393
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse_3 v7.0
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/pqqn-pm43
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv7.0
Metadata sourceirw_meta v23.0