20,000 rated or chosen profiles from 2,000 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 3 attributes.
One of 12 tables from the same source; this one is the belgium table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Online respondents in Belgium (2021) compared two proposals for a new law requiring companies to disclose environmental and working conditions in their international supply chains, in 5 paired tasks varying which companies the law covers, reporting strictness and government enforcement; they chose one and said whether they favoured each. 2,000 respondents; part of a 12-country study. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Kolcava, D., Smith, E. K., & Bernauer, T. (2022). Cross-national public acceptance of sustainable global supply chain policy instruments. Nature Sustainability, 6(1), 69-80. |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/URL6A4 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,000 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 20,000 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 3 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | international economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | BE |
| Language shown | fr, nl, en |
| Language of stored levels | fr, nl, en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Suppose you had to decide between the two proposals in a vote today. Would you rather support Proposal A or Proposal B? [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | If you were presented Proposal A [Proposal B] today, would you be opposed or in favour of it? [rating, 0 (Opposed) to 1 (In favour)] |
attr_enforcementattr_sizeattr_strictnesschoicecov_attention_check_codecov_env_2cov_env_3cov_env_4cov_env_5cov_env_6cov_env_7cov_env_8cov_ideologycov_languagecov_support_regulationcov_svo_2cov_svo_3cov_svo_4cov_svo_5cov_svo_6cov_svo_7idprofileratingtasktrial_info_treatment
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("kolcava_2022_supply_chain_belgium", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("kolcava_2022_supply_chain_belgium", source="conj")
@article{Kolcava_2022, title={Cross-national public acceptance of sustainable global supply chain policy instruments}, volume={6}, ISSN={2398-9629}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8}, DOI={10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8}, number={1}, journal={Nature Sustainability}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Kolcava, Dennis and Smith, E. Keith and Bernauer, Thomas}, year={2022}, month=Nov, pages={69–80} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |