15,220 rated or chosen profiles from 1,522 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the wave1 table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	Hong Kong respondents (wave 1, before the June 2020 National Security Law; n=1,522) chose between two packages of government responses to the 2019 protest demands bundled with economic relief measures (9 attributes); 5 pairs each, forced choice.
Reference	Kobayashi, T., Song, J., & Chan, P. (2021). Does repression undermine opposition demands? The case of the Hong Kong National Security Law. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 22(4), 268-286.
DOI	10.1017/S1468109921000256
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KJBRQG

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice = which of two government-response packages the respondent preferred (wording not deposited; paraphrase), forced choice, one chosen per pair. Attribute levels are the authors' English labels, not necessarily the text shown; randomization restrictions undocumented. Wave 1 of 2 (pre-NSL); cov_party_id is the respondent's political camp. Qualtrics IDs re-keyed.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	1,522
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	15,220
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	9
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	democracy institutions
A profile represents	policy
Country	HK
Language shown	unknown
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which of the two packages do you prefer? (paraphrase) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_amnestyattr_cash_handoutattr_ce_resignationattr_housing_rent_waiverattr_police_inquiryattr_rates_waiverattr_rioter_classificationattr_tax_reductionattr_universal_suffragechoicecov_party_ididprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("kobayashi_2021_hk_demands_wave1", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("kobayashi_2021_hk_demands_wave1", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Kobayashi_2021, title={Does repression undermine opposition demands? The case of the Hong Kong National Security Law}, volume={22}, ISSN={1474-0060}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1468109921000256}, DOI={10.1017/s1468109921000256}, number={4}, journal={Japanese Journal of Political Science}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Kobayashi, Tetsuro and Song, Jaehyun and Chan, Polly}, year={2021}, month=Oct, pages={268–286} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0