10,172 rated or chosen profiles from 1,047 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the s2 table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	1,047 US survey respondents (study 2) compared pairs of hypothetical foreign countries in 5 tasks, choosing one and judging each acceptable or not; profiles vary 8 attributes: ally/adversary (a), dc, ms, human-rights record (hr), economic effect (ec), regime (gov), nuclear status (nuc), treaty (tr). Attribute stems and level tags are the deposit's (no codebook).
Reference	Kennedy, R. (2023). Do Americans care about human rights? [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse.
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/oy8ezy

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). Five tasks of two hypothetical countries; choice = preferred of the pair (forced, no opt-out), rating_acceptable = 0/1 judgement of each profile. The deposit stores dummy-coded levels with short tags and no codebook, so attribute names and levels are the stored stems and tags, not displayed text; question wording is not documented. Tasks with a missing choice were dropped.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	1,047
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	10,172
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	8
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	foreign policy security
A profile represents	place
Country	US
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	unknown
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	unknown (choose one of two profiles; wording not in deposit) [choice, forced]
rating_acceptable	unknown ('acceptable' 0/1 judgement of each profile; wording not in deposit) [rating, 0 (not acceptable (presumed)) to 1 (acceptable (presumed))]

Columns

attr_aattr_dcattr_ecattr_govattr_hrattr_msattr_nucattr_trchoiceidprofilerating_acceptabletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("kennedy_2023_hr_partner_s2", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("kennedy_2023_hr_partner_s2", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/oy8ezy,
  doi = {10.7910/DVN/OY8EZY},
  url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OY8EZY},
  author = {Kennedy, Ryan},
  keywords = {Social Sciences},
  title = {Do Americans Care About Human Rights?},
  publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
  year = {2023}
}

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0