3,216 rated or chosen profiles from 268 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.

One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the uk_pros table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	UK creative-sector professional respondents (Dynata; n=268) imagined selling rights in a landscape photo to a guidebook publisher and made 6 forced choices between two contracts varying price (25/50 GBP) and four yes/no rights transfers (attribution, issuing copies, reproduction, derivative works).
Reference	Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., & Nahmias, Y. (2025). The price of creativity: A conjoint experiment in copyrights. Journal of Public Policy, 45(2), 245-269.
DOI	10.1017/S0143814X25000042
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BIBHUW

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice: which of Contract A and Contract B the respondent would accept (paraphrase; forced choice, no opt-out). Five 2-level attributes randomly set each task; attribute row order randomized per respondent (not deposited). Task and profile are inferred from row order (task order assumed). Deposited sample = the authors' analysis sample after attention-check and completion exclusions; N matches the article.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	268
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	3,216
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	5
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	other
A profile represents	product service
Country	GB
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	inferred from row order
Profile position	inferred from row order

Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choice	Choose between Contract A and Contract B (paraphrase) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_derivativeattr_issue_copiesattr_no_attributionattr_priceattr_reproducechoicecov_agecov_genderidprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("kantorowicz_2025_copyright_uk_pros", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("kantorowicz_2025_copyright_uk_pros", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Kantorowicz_2025, title={The price of creativity: a conjoint experiment in copyrights}, volume={45}, ISSN={1469-7815}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X25000042}, DOI={10.1017/s0143814x25000042}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Public Policy}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw and Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena and Nahmias, Yifat}, year={2025}, month=Feb, pages={245–269} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0