28,656 rated or chosen profiles from 2,388 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the germany table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	German online-panel respondents chose between pairs of hypothetical Brexit withdrawal agreements varying on seven negotiation issues (exit bill, citizens' rights, free movement, EU law, trade, services, EU programmes); 2,388 respondents, 6 pairs each, two survey waves pooled. Outcome is a forced choice.
Reference	Jurado, I., León, S., & Walter, S. (2022). Brexit dilemmas: Shaping postwithdrawal relations with a leaving state. International Organization, 76(2), 273-304.
DOI	10.1017/S0020818321000412
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3DNBNQ

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice: "Which Brexit agreement would you choose if the decision were yours?" (forced, no opt-out). Two cross-sectional waves pooled, wave in trial_wave. Labels are the authors' English versions of the German text. Level frequencies are unequal (randomization weights undocumented). profile assumes the source's ab = 0 is agreement A.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Design

Topic	international economy
A profile represents	policy
Country	DE
Language shown	de
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Welche Brexit-Vereinbarung würden Sie wählen, wenn die Entscheidung bei Ihnen läge? [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_brexit_billattr_business_freedomattr_eu_law_applicabilityattr_eu_programmesattr_freedom_of_movementattr_rights_eu_citizens_in_ukattr_tradechoicecov_age_groupcov_business_tiescov_country_handlingcov_economic_harmcov_educationcov_employedcov_eu_opinioncov_eu_referendumcov_friends_ukcov_gendercov_goal_avoid_more_contributionscov_goal_avoid_more_exitscov_goal_mutual_agreementcov_goal_protect_economic_interestscov_goal_punish_ukcov_ideologycov_retiredcov_riskcov_soft_hardcov_unemployedcov_voteidprofiletasktrial_wave

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("jurado_2022_brexit_deal_germany", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("jurado_2022_brexit_deal_germany", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Jurado_2021, title={Brexit Dilemmas: Shaping Postwithdrawal Relations with a Leaving State}, volume={76}, ISSN={1531-5088}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000412}, DOI={10.1017/s0020818321000412}, number={2}, journal={International Organization}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Jurado, Ignacio and León, Sandra and Walter, Stefanie}, year={2021}, month=Oct, pages={273–304} }

Respondents	2,388
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	28,656
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	7
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0

jurado_2022_brexit_deal_germany