2,916 rated or chosen profiles from 324 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 9 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
| Description | Members of Austrian party executives (2021 web survey) saw nine hypothetical aspirant profiles, deselected three, then ranked the remaining six to list positions 1-6 (two-stage conjoint, one task). 324 respondents. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Jankowski, M., & Rehmert, J. (2024). Selecting and ranking female candidates under PR: Evidence from a two-stage conjoint experiment with party elites. European Journal of Political Research. |
| DOI | 10.1111/1475-6765.12726 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/O1ILRD |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 324 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 2,916 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 9 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | AT |
| Language shown | de |
| Language of stored levels | de |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| rating_deselected | Wen würden Sie nicht nominieren? [rating, 0 (not ticked (kept for the list)) to 1 (ticked (would not nominate))] |
|---|---|
| rating_list_position | Nominierung auf Listenplatz... (each of the six remaining candidates is nominated to list position 1-6) [rating, 1 (Listenplatz 1 (top of the list)) to 6 (Listenplatz 6)] |
attr_ageattr_genderattr_intraparty_positionattr_parliament_experienceattr_party_deviationattr_personal_votesattr_policy_expertiseattr_regional_listattr_state_federal_listattrpos_ageattrpos_genderattrpos_intraparty_positionattrpos_parliament_experienceattrpos_party_deviationattrpos_personal_votesattrpos_policy_expertiseattrpos_regional_listattrpos_state_federal_listcov_birth_decadecov_board_districtcov_board_federalcov_board_statecov_duration_seccov_gendercov_influence_federalcov_influence_regionalcov_influence_statecov_lr_partycov_lr_selfcov_partycov_selects_federalcov_selects_nonecov_selects_regionalcov_selects_statecov_strategyidprofilerating_deselectedrating_list_positiontask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("jankowski_2024_list_ranking_austria", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("jankowski_2024_list_ranking_austria", source="conj")
@article{Jankowski_2025, title={Selecting and ranking female candidates under PR: Evidence from a two‐stage conjoint experiment with party elites}, volume={64}, ISSN={1475-6765}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12726}, DOI={10.1111/1475-6765.12726}, number={3}, journal={European Journal of Political Research}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Jankowski, Michael and Rehmert, Jochen}, year={2025}, month=Aug, pages={1016–1038} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |