27,566 rated or chosen profiles from 1,253 respondents, in up to 11 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the 2023 table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | US online panel respondents (Study 1, fielded 28-30 October 2023, after the Gaza ground invasion; 1,253 completes, 1,198 in the authors' sample) chose which of two hypothetical groups in a dispute they sympathized with more, over 11 pairs (the 11th repeats the first, flipped) described by 8 binary attributes such as majority religion, democracy and territorial goal. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Inouye, R., & Horiuchi, Y. (2026). Unraveling Americans' selective sympathies toward Israelis and Palestinians. International Studies Quarterly, 70(2), sqag027. |
| DOI | 10.1093/isq/sqag027 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CS7USS |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,253 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 27,566 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 11 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | foreign policy security, social identity interpersonal |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): within a task the two groups always take different levels on every (binary) attribute, so Group B is the mirror image of Group A |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which side do you sympathize more with: Group A or Group B? Even if you are not entirely sure, please indicate the answer you are more inclined towards. [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_alliance_usattr_democracyattr_economic_developmentattr_majority_religionattr_military_actionsattr_military_strengthattr_territorial_goalattr_threats_to_civiliansattrpos_alliance_usattrpos_democracyattrpos_economic_developmentattrpos_majority_religionattrpos_military_actionsattrpos_military_strengthattrpos_territorial_goalattrpos_threats_to_civilianschoicecov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_in_authors_samplecov_party_id7cov_perspectivecov_raceidprofiletasktrial_repeat_of
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("inouye_2026_sympathies_2023", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("inouye_2026_sympathies_2023", source="conj")
@article{Inouye_2026, title={Unraveling Americans’ Selective Sympathies Toward Israelis and Palestinians}, volume={70}, ISSN={1468-2478}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag027}, DOI={10.1093/isq/sqag027}, number={2}, journal={International Studies Quarterly}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Inouye, Rikio and Horiuchi, Yusaku}, year={2026}, month=Mar }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |