19,986 rated or chosen profiles from 3,331 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the jp table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Paired conjoint on Japan-China relations: 3,331 Japanese online respondents chose between two hypothetical bilateral policy packages in 3 tasks varying Yasukuni visits, One Belt One Road cooperation, tariffs in each direction, Japan's constitutional amendment and Diaoyu/Senkaku sovereignty and resource development. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Incerti, T., Mattingly, D., Rosenbluth, F., Tanaka, S., & Yue, J. (2021). Hawkish partisans: How political parties shape nationalist conflicts in China and Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1494-1515. |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0007123420000095 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/S4YXQB |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 3,331 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 19,986 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 3 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | foreign policy security |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | ja |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Diaoyu/Senkaku resource development 'by Japan only' not available if China has sovereignty; 'by China only' not available if Japan has sovereignty (both pairs absent in the data) |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Although it may be difficult to evaluate some policies, please compare the two sets of policy proposals and choose which proposal you prefer between the two. (translated) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_china_tariffattr_constitutionattr_diaoyu_developmentattr_diaoyu_sovereigntyattr_economic_cooperationattr_japan_tariffattr_yasukuniattrpos_china_tariffattrpos_constitutionattrpos_diaoyu_developmentattrpos_diaoyu_sovereigntyattrpos_economic_cooperationattrpos_japan_tariffattrpos_yasukunichoicecov_age_group_codecov_education_codecov_genderidprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("incerti_2021_china_japan_jp", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("incerti_2021_china_japan_jp", source="conj")
@article{Incerti_2020, title={Hawkish Partisans: How Political Parties Shape Nationalist Conflicts in China and Japan}, volume={51}, ISSN={1469-2112}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000095}, DOI={10.1017/s0007123420000095}, number={4}, journal={British Journal of Political Science}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Incerti, Trevor and Mattingly, Daniel and Rosenbluth, Frances and Tanaka, Seiki and Yue, Jiahua}, year={2020}, month=July, pages={1494–1515} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |