11,759 rated or chosen profiles from 980 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description	US citizens (Qualtrics panel, 2018; n = 980) chose between 6 pairs of hypothetical persons varying in citizenship, country of birth, education, gender, income-tax payment and residence, and rated each 1-7 on extending voting rights to them.
Reference	Hultin Rosenberg, J., & Wejryd, J. (2022). Attitudes toward competing voting-right requirements: Evidence from a conjoint experiment. Electoral Studies, 77, 102470.
DOI	10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102470
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EPH0FI

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). Outcomes: choice of one of two hypothetical persons (question wording not deposited; the authors treat it as which should have voting rights) and a 1-7 rating of each (the authors code 5-7 as granting and 1-3 as denying the vote; anchors not deposited). 22-43 respondents per pair skipped the choice (choice NA on both profiles, ratings kept); 29 profile ratings are missing. Level text is the authors' value labels. The 19 respondents Qualtrics did not flag as good completers are dropped, as in the authors' analysis (N = 980).

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	980
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	11,759
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	democracy institutions, immigration asylum
A profile represents	person
Country	US
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which of the two persons should have the right to vote? (paraphrase; wording not deposited) [choice, forced]
rating	Rating of granting this person voting rights, 1-7 (paraphrase; wording not deposited) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_bornattr_citizenshipattr_eduattr_genderattr_residenceattr_taxpayerchoicecov_agecov_duration_seccov_educationcov_employmentcov_gendercov_household_incomecov_importance_democracycov_us_bornidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("hultinrosenberg_2022_voting_rights", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("hultinrosenberg_2022_voting_rights", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Rosenberg_2022, title={Attitudes toward competing voting-right requirements: Evidence from a conjoint experiment}, volume={77}, ISSN={0261-3794}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102470}, DOI={10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102470}, journal={Electoral Studies}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Rosenberg, Jonas Hultin and Wejryd, Johan}, year={2022}, month=June, pages={102470} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0