holloway_2025_indigenous_candidates

3,914 rated or chosen profiles from 3,914 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionAustralian adults (n = 3,914) saw one photographed prospective candidate, randomly drawn from eight cells (Chinese-Australian, Indigenous dark-skinned, Indigenous light-skinned or White, each man or woman), and rated eight personality traits and attractiveness.
ReferenceHolloway, J., McDonnell, D., & Evans, M. (2025). The inverted hierarchy: How public bias can favor potential Indigenous candidates. Perspectives on Politics.
DOI10.1017/S1537592725102107
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ATSAKJ

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents3,914
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)3,914
Tasks per respondent (most)1
Profiles per task1
Attributes2

Design

Topiccandidate choice
A profile representsperson
CountryAU
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Task orderinferred from row order
Profile positioninferred from row order

Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

rating_approachableQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is approachable (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_attractiveQ25 attractiveness of the candidate (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Extremely unattractive) to 9 (Extremely attractive)]
rating_compassionateQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is compassionate (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_competentQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is competent (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_experiencedQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is experienced (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_hardworkingQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is hardworking (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_intelligentQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is intelligent (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_likeableQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is likeable (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]
rating_trustworthyQ13 candidate trait perceptions: agreement that the candidate is trustworthy (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)]

Columns

attr_ethnicityattr_gendercov_agecov_educationcov_gendercov_party_ididprofilerating_approachablerating_attractiverating_compassionaterating_competentrating_experiencedrating_hardworkingrating_intelligentrating_likeablerating_trustworthytasktrial_scale_order

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("holloway_2025_indigenous_candidates", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("holloway_2025_indigenous_candidates", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Holloway_2025, title={The Inverted Hierarchy: How Public Bias Can Favor Potential Indigenous Candidates}, volume={24}, ISSN={1541-0986}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592725102107}, DOI={10.1017/s1537592725102107}, number={2}, journal={Perspectives on Politics}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Holloway, Josh and McDonnell, Duncan and Evans, Michelle}, year={2025}, month=Oct, pages={616–635} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv1.4
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0