32,930 rated or chosen profiles from 3,293 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
| Description | British YouGov panel respondents (April 2017, n = 3,293) compared 5 pairs of possible Brexit negotiation outcomes varying on immigration, citizens' rights, trade, EU law, budget contributions, one-off payment, Irish border checks and timing; choice plus per-outcome acceptability, whether each respects the referendum result, and likelihood of the chosen outcome. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Hobolt, S. B., Tilley, J., & Leeper, T. J. (2022). Policy preferences and policy legitimacy after referendums: Evidence from the Brexit negotiations. Political Behavior, 44(2), 839-858. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-020-09639-w |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EFXNLX |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 3,293 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 32,930 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | international economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | GB |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of these two outcomes do you prefer? [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_acceptable | How acceptable or unacceptable are each of the outcomes to you personally? [rating, 1 (Completely acceptable) to 4 (Completely unacceptable)] |
| rating_likely | How likely do you think it is that the outcome that you have chosen actually happens? [rating, 1 (Very likely) to 4 (Not at all likely)] |
| rating_respects_referendum | Which outcome(s) do you think would respect the result of the referendum? [rating, 0 (answer does not include this outcome (other outcome or neither)) to 1 (this outcome (alone or both) would respect the result)] |
attr_borderattr_budgetattr_immigrationattr_lawsattr_paymentattr_rightsattr_timelineattr_tradeattrpos_borderattrpos_budgetattrpos_immigrationattrpos_lawsattrpos_paymentattrpos_rightsattrpos_timelineattrpos_tradechoicecov_agecov_class_identitycov_educationcov_gendercov_regioncov_social_gradecov_survey_weightcov_vote_2015cov_vote_eurefidprofilerating_acceptablerating_likelyrating_respects_referendumtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("hobolt_2022_brexit_negotiations", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("hobolt_2022_brexit_negotiations", source="conj")
@article{Hobolt_2020, title={Policy Preferences and Policy Legitimacy After Referendums: Evidence from the Brexit Negotiations}, volume={44}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09639-w}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-020-09639-w}, number={2}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Hobolt, Sara B. and Tilley, James and Leeper, Thomas J.}, year={2020}, month=Aug, pages={839–858} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |