higashijima_2026_muslim_immigrants

18,000 rated or chosen profiles from 3,000 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 10 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionAdults in Kazakhstan (interviewer-administered, Jan-Feb 2021, n=3,000) compared two hypothetical immigrants on 10 attributes (education, gender, ethnicity, language, reason, profession, experience, religion, intended stay, legal status); 3 pairs each, forced choice plus two 1-7 ratings of each immigrant.
ReferenceHigashijima, M., Igarashi, A., & Woo, Y. (2026). Do Muslim citizens welcome fundamentalist Muslim immigrants? Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Kazakhstan. Political Behavior.
DOI10.1007/s11109-026-10177-0
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GJFYGX

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents3,000
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)18,000
Tasks per respondent (most)3
Profiles per task2
Attributes10
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicimmigration asylum
A profile representsperson
CountryKZ
Language shownru, kk
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsyes (stated by the source): computer programmer, doctor, financial analyst, research scientist only with university or postgraduate education; Russian ethnicity only with 'Kazakh and Russian', 'Russian and broken Kazakh', 'Russian and no Kazakh'. Level shares unequal as a result (Russian 762 profiles vs ~2,150 per other ethnicity; high-skill professions ~570 vs ~1,970; university/postgraduate 1.5x other education levels), consistent with uniform draws under the two constraints; no probabilities documented
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.

Outcomes:

choiceIf you had to choose between the two, which person would you prefer to have as your neighbor? [choice, forced]
ratingwillingness to accept each immigrant, seven-point agree-disagree scale (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree)]
rating_simunknown [rating, 1 (Extremely different) to 7 (Extremely similar)]

Columns

attr_educationattr_ethnicityattr_experienceattr_genderattr_languageattr_legal_statusattr_professionattr_reasonattr_religionattr_staychoicecov_agecov_ethnicitycov_gendercov_interview_languagecov_regioncov_religionidprofileratingrating_simtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("higashijima_2026_muslim_immigrants", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("higashijima_2026_muslim_immigrants", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Higashijima_2026, title={Do Muslim Citizens Welcome Fundamentalist Muslim Immigrants? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Kazakhstan}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10177-0}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-026-10177-0}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Higashijima, Masaaki and Igarashi, Akira and Woo, Yujin}, year={2026}, month=June }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0