4,116 rated or chosen profiles from 2,058 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the transparency table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	UK YouGov omnibus respondents (2022, n=2,058) rated two hypothetical UK aid agencies side by side (Experiment 2) on 1-10 support for giving foreign aid through each; agencies varied in Yes/No on six types of information the agency discloses (aid strategy, decision-making, organisational structure, operational costs, staff, project details).
Reference	Heinzel, M., Reinsberg, B., & Swedlund, H. (2024). Transparency and citizen support for public agencies: The case of foreign aid. Governance, 38(2), e12863.
DOI	10.1111/gove.12863
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QDQ4LU

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). Article Experiment 2. rating: 'Please indicate to what extent you support giving foreign aid through each aid agency' 1 (strongly oppose) to 10 (strongly support), one rating per agency, one task of two agencies; no choice, no opt-out. Each attribute is a statement shown with Yes/No, independently randomized. Survey weight kept (cov_survey_weight). N = 2,058 matches the article.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Design

Topic	international economy
A profile represents	organisation
Country	GB
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

rating	Please indicate to what extent you support giving foreign aid through each aid agency. [rating, 1 (Strongly oppose) to 10 (Strongly support)]

Columns

attr_decision_makingattr_operational_costsattr_projectattr_staffattr_strategyattr_structurecov_agecov_aid_spending_goodcov_educationcov_fcdo_supportcov_fcdo_treatmentcov_gendercov_house_tenurecov_regioncov_social_gradecov_survey_weightcov_trust_uk_civil_servicecov_trust_uk_governmentcov_vote_eurefcov_vote_ge_2019cov_voted_ge_2019idprofileratingtasktrial_question_order

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("heinzel_2024_aid_transparency", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("heinzel_2024_aid_transparency", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Heinzel_2024, title={Transparency and citizen support for public agencies: The case of foreign aid}, volume={38}, ISSN={1468-0491}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12863}, DOI={10.1111/gove.12863}, number={2}, journal={Governance}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Heinzel, Mirko and Reinsberg, Bernhard and Swedlund, Haley}, year={2024}, month=Mar }

Respondents	2,058
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	4,116
Tasks per respondent (most)	1
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0

heinzel_2024_aid_transparency