2,360 rated or chosen profiles from 2,360 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.
| Description | Voters in North Maharashtra, India (in-person survey, n = 2,360) read one vignette about a village council president whose gender (Bharti/Rohit, female/male) and caste (Kamble/Marathe, Dalit/Maratha) were randomized 2x2, and judged whether the president would hold real decision-making authority, would resign under elite pressure, and would face backlash. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Heinze, A. R. (2025). Democratic deepening or elite persistence? How local elites adapt to electoral reform in rural India. American Political Science Review. |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0003055425101068 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QGH7P4 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,360 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 2,360 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 2 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | IN |
| Language shown | unknown |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| rating_authority | Now imagine there are some important decisions to be made in the village. As you probably know, sometimes other people – influential people in the village, village elders, other council members, or family members – step in and take village decisions in the place of the sarpanch or are generally more active than the sarpanch. Sometimes however it is the case that the sarpanch is the most influential actor. In this village, do you think that a president like [Bharti/Rohit] [Kamble/Marathe] would be the one who is the most active in taking village decisions, or do you think it would be someone else? [rating, 0 (Someone else) to 1 (Sarpanch)] |
|---|---|
| rating_backlash | Now imagine that [Bharti/Rohit] [Kamble/Marathe] becomes quite powerful as a sarpanch. She makes her own decisions about what is best for the village, which are not always in line with what the influential villagers want, and she refuses to resign from her position as sarpanch. Do you think that [Bharti/Rohit] [Kamble/Marathe] would likely face backlash from influential people in the village? For example, threats, bullying, or violence? [rating, 0 (No, it is not likely) to 1 (Yes, it is likely)] |
| rating_resign | As you probably know, in almost every village, there are generally some influential people when it comes to village affairs, for example a chawdi group, or bhauki leaders. Imagine that influential people in this village ask [Bharti/Rohit] [Kamble/Marathe] to resign from their post as sarpanch. Do you think that a president like [Bharti/Rohit] [Kamble/Marathe] would accept this request and resign, or would [she/he] resist the request? [rating, 0 (Resist) to 1 (Resign)] |
attr_casteattr_gendercov_agecov_castecov_educationcov_gendercov_knowledge_local_politicscov_location_typecov_religioncov_voted_2019cov_women_vote_normidprofilerating_authorityrating_backlashrating_resigntask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("heinze_2025_sarpanch_vignette", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("heinze_2025_sarpanch_vignette", source="conj")
@article{HEINZE_2025, title={Democratic Deepening or Elite Persistence? How Local Elites Adapt to Electoral Reform in Rural India}, volume={120}, ISSN={1537-5943}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055425101068}, DOI={10.1017/s0003055425101068}, number={3}, journal={American Political Science Review}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={HEINZE, ALYSSA R.}, year={2025}, month=Oct, pages={876–895} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |