36,272 rated or chosen profiles from 1,834 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 14 attributes.
| Description | Japanese adults (Rakuten Insight online panel, July 2022; n = 1,834 answering) made 10 forced choices between two hypothetical political parties varying on 11 valence attributes (ministers, MPs, bills, scandals, leader tenure and personality, ...) and 3 policy positions, 5 tasks for the district vote and 5 for the proportional-representation vote. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Hamzawi, Kato, & Endo (2025). What brings you to the party? Voter preferences on parties through policy and valence dynamics. Party Politics. |
| DOI | 10.1177/13540688251339631 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FTIKPX |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,834 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 36,272 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 14 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | parties platforms |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | organisation |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Preprint Table 1 note: ministers yes -> MPs not 0; ministers no -> MPs not 374; committee chairs 22 or bills 64 -> MPs 374 or 128; chairs 11 or bills 33 -> MPs 374/128/59; chairs 6 or bills 16 -> MPs 374/128/59/32; chairs 2 or bills 7 -> MPs not 4/1/0; chairs 1 or bills 1 or MPs reelected all -> MPs not 374/128/0; chairs 0 or bills 0 -> MPs not 374/128; reelected 3/4, half or 1/4 -> MPs not 1/0; reelected 0 -> MPs 11/4/1/0; leader 8 years -> formation not 5/2/<1 years; leader 5 years -> formation not 2/<1; leader 2 years -> formation not <1. Level shares follow from these (MPs: 0 members 97 rows vs 59 members 12,718). |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | 次の2つの架空の政党のうち、どちらの政党に所属する候補者が選挙区の投票先としてより好ましいと思いますか。もし、どちらが好ましいかはっきりとは言えない場合でも、どちらか一方、あえていえばより好ましいと思われる方を選んでください。 (district tasks; PR tasks read 比例区 for 選挙区) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_bills_introducedattr_committee_chairsattr_districts_with_candidatesattr_leader_personalityattr_leader_tenureattr_ministersattr_mpsattr_mps_reelectedattr_policy_constitutionattr_policy_consumption_taxattr_policy_dual_surnameattr_promises_achievedattr_scandalsattr_years_since_formationattrpos_bills_introducedattrpos_committee_chairsattrpos_districts_with_candidatesattrpos_leader_personalityattrpos_leader_tenureattrpos_ministersattrpos_mpsattrpos_mps_reelectedattrpos_policy_constitutionattrpos_policy_consumption_taxattrpos_policy_dual_surnameattrpos_promises_achievedattrpos_scandalsattrpos_years_since_formationchoicecov_constref_defendcov_constref_excl_art9cov_constref_incl_art9cov_dual_surnamecov_party_idcov_tax_5pctcov_tax_8pctcov_tax_abolishcov_tax_status_quocov_therm_cdpcov_therm_dpfpcov_therm_ishincov_therm_jcpcov_therm_komeitocov_therm_ldpidprofiletasktrial_context
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("hamzawi_2025_party_valence", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("hamzawi_2025_party_valence", source="conj")
@article{Hamzawi_2025, title={What brings you to the party? Voter preferences on parties through policy and valence dynamics}, volume={32}, ISSN={1460-3683}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13540688251339631}, DOI={10.1177/13540688251339631}, number={4}, journal={Party Politics}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Hamzawi, Jordan and Kato, Gento and Endo, Masahisa}, year={2025}, month=May, pages={486–499} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |