hamzawi_2025_party_valence

36,272 rated or chosen profiles from 1,834 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 14 attributes.

About this table

DescriptionJapanese adults (Rakuten Insight online panel, July 2022; n = 1,834 answering) made 10 forced choices between two hypothetical political parties varying on 11 valence attributes (ministers, MPs, bills, scandals, leader tenure and personality, ...) and 3 policy positions, 5 tasks for the district vote and 5 for the proportional-representation vote.
ReferenceHamzawi, Kato, & Endo (2025). What brings you to the party? Voter preferences on parties through policy and valence dynamics. Party Politics.
DOI10.1177/13540688251339631
LicenceCC BY 4.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FTIKPX

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents1,834
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)36,272
Tasks per respondent (most)10
Profiles per task2
Attributes14
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicparties platforms
A profile representsorganisation
CountryJP
Language shownja
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsyes (stated by the source): Preprint Table 1 note: ministers yes -> MPs not 0; ministers no -> MPs not 374; committee chairs 22 or bills 64 -> MPs 374 or 128; chairs 11 or bills 33 -> MPs 374/128/59; chairs 6 or bills 16 -> MPs 374/128/59/32; chairs 2 or bills 7 -> MPs not 4/1/0; chairs 1 or bills 1 or MPs reelected all -> MPs not 374/128/0; chairs 0 or bills 0 -> MPs not 374/128; reelected 3/4, half or 1/4 -> MPs not 1/0; reelected 0 -> MPs 11/4/1/0; leader 8 years -> formation not 5/2/<1 years; leader 5 years -> formation not 2/<1; leader 2 years -> formation not <1. Level shares follow from these (MPs: 0 members 97 rows vs 59 members 12,718).
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.

Outcomes:

choice次の2つの架空の政党のうち、どちらの政党に所属する候補者が選挙区の投票先としてより好ましいと思いますか。もし、どちらが好ましいかはっきりとは言えない場合でも、どちらか一方、あえていえばより好ましいと思われる方を選んでください。 (district tasks; PR tasks read 比例区 for 選挙区) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_bills_introducedattr_committee_chairsattr_districts_with_candidatesattr_leader_personalityattr_leader_tenureattr_ministersattr_mpsattr_mps_reelectedattr_policy_constitutionattr_policy_consumption_taxattr_policy_dual_surnameattr_promises_achievedattr_scandalsattr_years_since_formationattrpos_bills_introducedattrpos_committee_chairsattrpos_districts_with_candidatesattrpos_leader_personalityattrpos_leader_tenureattrpos_ministersattrpos_mpsattrpos_mps_reelectedattrpos_policy_constitutionattrpos_policy_consumption_taxattrpos_policy_dual_surnameattrpos_promises_achievedattrpos_scandalsattrpos_years_since_formationchoicecov_constref_defendcov_constref_excl_art9cov_constref_incl_art9cov_dual_surnamecov_party_idcov_tax_5pctcov_tax_8pctcov_tax_abolishcov_tax_status_quocov_therm_cdpcov_therm_dpfpcov_therm_ishincov_therm_jcpcov_therm_komeitocov_therm_ldpidprofiletasktrial_context

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("hamzawi_2025_party_valence", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("hamzawi_2025_party_valence", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Hamzawi_2025, title={What brings you to the party? Voter preferences on parties through policy and valence dynamics}, volume={32}, ISSN={1460-3683}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13540688251339631}, DOI={10.1177/13540688251339631}, number={4}, journal={Party Politics}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Hamzawi, Jordan and Kato, Gento and Endo, Masahisa}, year={2025}, month=May, pages={486–499} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0