7,272 rated or chosen profiles from 394 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
One of 6 tables from the same source; this one is the forced table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Swiss citizens from municipalities that used naturalization referendums before 2004 (telephone-recruited probability sample, online survey) (n = 394) judged hypothetical immigrant applicants for Swiss naturalization varying on 7 attributes in the paired conjoint with forced choice arm of a design-comparison experiment; outcome: forced choice of the applicant preferred for naturalization. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395-2400. |
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1416587112 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27793 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 394 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 7,272 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | CH |
| Language shown | unknown |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | observed in the data (not documented by the source): German and Austrian applicants never have 'Adequate' German; age '21 Years' never with '29 Years' since arrival. Level shares unequal: origin Italy and Turkey ~26% each vs ~6-9% for the other six; language 'Perfect' 52%; age '21 Years' 20%; residency '29 Years' 20%. |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | unknown |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of the two immigrant applicants do you prefer for naturalization? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_ageattr_educationattr_genderattr_integrationattr_languageattr_originattr_years_since_arrivalchoicecov_survey_complicatedcov_survey_toolongcov_survey_weightcov_voted_targetidprofiletasktrial_submit_sec
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("hainmueller_2015_natur_forced", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("hainmueller_2015_natur_forced", source="conj")
@article{Hainmueller_2015, title={Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior}, volume={112}, ISSN={1091-6490}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112}, DOI={10.1073/pnas.1416587112}, number={8}, journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, publisher={National Academy of Sciences}, author={Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik and Yamamoto, Teppei}, year={2015}, month=Feb, pages={2395–2400} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |