10,000 rated or chosen profiles from 1,000 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.
| Description | 1,000 US adults (Verasight panel) chose between two hypothetical flights in 5 tasks; flights varied airline, fuel type (sustainable aviation fuel vs conventional), included baggage, legroom, seat type and price. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Kriner, D., Goldfarb, J. L., Tester, J., & Bhujle, T. (2026). Replication data for: Comfort or climate? Consumer trade-offs between sustainable aviation fuel and flight amenities [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DOHF01 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,000 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 10,000 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 6 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | consumer products |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | product service |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of these two flights would you choose? [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_airlineattr_baggageattr_fuel_typeattr_legroomattr_priceattr_seat_typeattrpos_airlineattrpos_baggageattrpos_fuel_typeattrpos_legroomattrpos_priceattrpos_seat_typechoicecov_agecov_climate_changecov_educationcov_gendercov_ideologycov_incomecov_party_idcov_party_leancov_race_asiancov_race_blackcov_race_hispaniccov_race_native_americancov_race_othercov_race_whitecov_regioncov_religioncov_saf_familiarcov_saf_safecov_sci_know_selfcov_sciknow_1cov_sciknow_2cov_sciknow_3cov_sciknow_4cov_sciknow_5cov_sciknow_6cov_sciknow_7cov_sciknow_8cov_sciknow_9cov_statecov_survey_weightcov_trump_approvecov_vote_2024cov_vote_choice_2024idprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("goldfarb_2026_aviation_fuel", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("goldfarb_2026_aviation_fuel", source="conj")
@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/dohf01,
doi = {10.7910/DVN/DOHF01},
url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/DOHF01},
author = {{Kriner, Douglas} and Goldfarb, Jillian L. and Tester, Jefferson and Bhujle, Trisha},
keywords = {Engineering, Social Sciences, Sustainable aviation fuel, consumer preference, public opinion, conjoint experiment, public science knowledge},
title = {Replication Data for: Comfort or climate? Consumer trade-offs between sustainable aviation fuel and flight amenities},
publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
year = {2026}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |