goldfarb_2026_aviation_fuel

10,000 rated or chosen profiles from 1,000 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description1,000 US adults (Verasight panel) chose between two hypothetical flights in 5 tasks; flights varied airline, fuel type (sustainable aviation fuel vs conventional), included baggage, legroom, seat type and price.
ReferenceKriner, D., Goldfarb, J. L., Tester, J., & Bhujle, T. (2026). Replication data for: Comfort or climate? Consumer trade-offs between sustainable aviation fuel and flight amenities [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse.
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DOHF01

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents1,000
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)10,000
Tasks per respondent (most)5
Profiles per task2
Attributes6
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicconsumer products
A profile representsproduct service
CountryUS
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsunknown
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choiceWhich of these two flights would you choose? [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_airlineattr_baggageattr_fuel_typeattr_legroomattr_priceattr_seat_typeattrpos_airlineattrpos_baggageattrpos_fuel_typeattrpos_legroomattrpos_priceattrpos_seat_typechoicecov_agecov_climate_changecov_educationcov_gendercov_ideologycov_incomecov_party_idcov_party_leancov_race_asiancov_race_blackcov_race_hispaniccov_race_native_americancov_race_othercov_race_whitecov_regioncov_religioncov_saf_familiarcov_saf_safecov_sci_know_selfcov_sciknow_1cov_sciknow_2cov_sciknow_3cov_sciknow_4cov_sciknow_5cov_sciknow_6cov_sciknow_7cov_sciknow_8cov_sciknow_9cov_statecov_survey_weightcov_trump_approvecov_vote_2024cov_vote_choice_2024idprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("goldfarb_2026_aviation_fuel", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("goldfarb_2026_aviation_fuel", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/dohf01,
  doi = {10.7910/DVN/DOHF01},
  url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/DOHF01},
  author = {{Kriner, Douglas} and Goldfarb, Jillian L. and Tester, Jefferson and Bhujle, Trisha},
  keywords = {Engineering, Social Sciences, Sustainable aviation fuel, consumer preference, public opinion, conjoint experiment, public science knowledge},
  title = {Replication Data for: Comfort or climate? Consumer trade-offs between sustainable aviation fuel and flight amenities},
  publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
  year = {2026}
}

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0