4,084 rated or chosen profiles from 417 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 4 attributes.
| Description | Syrian refugees in Lebanon (face-to-face survey, n=417 in the deposit) chose in up to 5 tasks which of two places in Syria a person like themselves should return to, places varying harm risk on route, chance of lasting peace, number of people known there and ease of finding work; forced choice. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Ghosn, F., Chu, T. S., Simon, M., Braithwaite, A., Frith, M., & Jandali, J. (2021). The journey home: Violence, anchoring, and refugee decisions to return. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 982-998. |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0003055421000344 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UGI0MH |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 417 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 4,084 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 4 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | LB |
| Language shown | ar |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | I would like you to imagine a person, like yourself, but this person is considering a return to Syria. I would like you to consider the following two places in Syria, where there is currently no fighting taking place and tell me which place in Syria you think this person should go to. [...] Now tell me, which place in Syria would you choose to return to? (translated) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_chance_of_peaceattr_ease_of_workattr_harm_on_routeattr_people_knownchoicecov_agecov_close_family_lebanoncov_currently_employedcov_didnt_finish_intermediatecov_didnt_finish_primarycov_displacement_yearscov_employed_2011cov_exp_violencecov_gender_codecov_have_childrencov_living_in_campcov_marriedcov_prewar_income_below200cov_registered_unidprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("ghosn_2021_refugee_return", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("ghosn_2021_refugee_return", source="conj")
@article{GHOSN_2021, title={The Journey Home: Violence, Anchoring, and Refugee Decisions to Return}, volume={115}, ISSN={1537-5943}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000344}, DOI={10.1017/s0003055421000344}, number={3}, journal={American Political Science Review}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={GHOSN, FATEN and CHU, TIFFANY S. and SIMON, MIRANDA and BRAITHWAITE, ALEX and FRITH, MICHAEL and JANDALI, JOANNA}, year={2021}, month=May, pages={982–998} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |