366,849 responses from 700 respondents to 525 items.
About this table
Description
Big Five and Metatraits
Reference
DeYoung, C. G., Tai, M. H., Chou, E., & Mlačić, B. (2026). Are the metatraits fact or artifact? Ruling out alternative explanations for the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 130(6), 1190–1207.
This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.
Instrument
525 Person-descriptive Adjectives (525-PDA)
Mean words per item
1
Mean characters per item
8.333
Mean characters per response
93.429
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
15.337
Codebook
This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, gerard_2018_metatraits.py. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.
Column
What it is
Source column
IRW standard columns
id
IRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task).
@article{DeYoung_2026, title={Are the metatraits fact or artifact? Ruling out alternative explanations for the higher-order factors of the Big Five.}, volume={130}, ISSN={0022-3514}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000593}, DOI={10.1037/pspp0000593}, number={6}, journal={Journal of Personality and Social Psychology}, publisher={American Psychological Association (APA)}, author={DeYoung, Colin G. and Tai, Ming Him and Chou, Edward and Mlačić, Boris}, year={2026}, month=June, pages={1190–1207} }